Arch Environ Health. 1999 May-Jun;54(3):147-9. doi: 10.1080/00039899909602251.
Consensus criteria for the definition of multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) were first identified in a 1989 multidisciplinary survey of 89 clinicians and researchers with extensive experience in, but widely differing views of, MCS. A decade later, their top 5 consensus criteria (i.e., defining MCS as [1] a chronic condition [2] with symptoms that recur reproducibly [3] in response to low levels of exposure [4] to multiple unrelated chemicals and [5] improve or resolve when incitants are removed) are still unrefuted in published literature. Along with a 6th criterion that we now propose adding (i.e., requiring that symptoms occur in multiple organ systems), these criteria are all commonly encompassed by research definitions of MCS. Nonetheless, their standardized use in clinical settings is still lacking, long overdue, and greatly needed--especially in light of government studies in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada that revealed 2-4 times as many cases of chemical sensitivity among Gulf War veterans than undeployed controls. In addition, state health department surveys of civilians in New Mexico and California showed that 2-6%, respectively, already had been diagnosed with MCS and that 16% of the civilians reported an "unusual sensitivity" to common everyday chemicals. Given this high prevalence, as well as the 1994 consensus of the American Lung Association, American Medical Association, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission that "complaints [of MCS] should not be dismissed as psychogenic, and a thorough workup is essential," we recommend that MCS be formally diagnosed--in addition to any other disorders that may be present--in all cases in which the 6 aforementioned consensus criteria are met and no single other organic disorder (e.g., mastocytosis) can account for all the signs and symptoms associated with chemical exposure. The millions of civilians and tens of thousands of Gulf War veterans who suffer from chemical sensitivity should not be kept waiting any longer for a standardized diagnosis while medical research continues to investigate the etiology of their signs and symptoms.
多重化学敏感性(MCS)定义的共识标准最初是在1989年对89名临床医生和研究人员进行的多学科调查中确定的,这些人员在MCS方面有着丰富的经验,但观点却大相径庭。十年后,他们的前5条共识标准(即将MCS定义为[1]一种慢性疾病[2]症状反复出现[3]对低水平暴露[4]于多种不相关化学物质产生反应,且[5]去除诱因后症状改善或消失)在已发表的文献中仍未被反驳。除了我们现在提议增加的第6条标准(即要求症状出现在多个器官系统)外,这些标准都普遍包含在MCS的研究定义中。尽管如此,它们在临床环境中的标准化应用仍然缺乏,早就应该实施,而且非常必要——尤其是考虑到美国、英国和加拿大的政府研究表明,海湾战争退伍军人中化学敏感性病例是未部署对照组的2至4倍。此外,新墨西哥州和加利福尼亚州卫生部门对平民的调查显示,分别有2%至6%的人已被诊断患有MCS,16%的平民报告对常见日常化学物质有“异常敏感性”。鉴于这种高患病率,以及美国肺脏协会、美国医学协会、美国环境保护局和美国消费品安全委员会在1994年达成的共识,即“对MCS的投诉不应被视为心因性而不予理会,全面检查至关重要”,我们建议,在所有满足上述6条共识标准且没有单一其他器质性疾病(如肥大细胞增多症)能够解释与化学物质暴露相关的所有体征和症状的病例中,除了可能存在的任何其他疾病外,还应正式诊断MCS。数百万患有化学敏感性的平民和数万名海湾战争退伍军人不应再继续等待标准化诊断,而医学研究仍在继续调查他们体征和症状的病因。