• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用额叶人格量表评估额叶行为综合征。

Assessing frontal lobe behavioral syndromes with the frontal lobe personality scale.

作者信息

Grace J, Stout J C, Malloy P F

机构信息

Brown University School of Medicine, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 1999 Sep;6(3):269-84. doi: 10.1177/107319119900600307.

DOI:10.1177/107319119900600307
PMID:10445964
Abstract

Reliability and construct validity are reported for the Frontal Lobe Personality Scale (FLOPS), a brief neurobehavior rating scale. The FLOPS Family form was completed by family members of 24 frontal lobe brain-damaged patients, 15 non-frontal lobe brain- damaged patients, and 48 healthy controls. Intrascale reliability was demonstrated (internal consistency.96; split half.93). Validity studies of frontal lobe patients post-lesion compared to their pre-lesion status, to healthy controls, and of frontal lobe patients pre- and post-lesion compared to non-frontal lobe patients pre- and post-lesion, indicated that frontal lobe patients post-lesion showed significantly more frontal behavior than (a) pre-lesion frontal lobe patients, (b) healthy controls, and (c) post-lesion non-frontal lobe patients. The FLOPS appears to be useful for quantifying frontal lobe behavior in clinical and research settings.

摘要

本文报告了一种简短的神经行为评定量表——额叶人格量表(FLOPS)的信度和结构效度。FLOPS家庭版由24名额叶脑损伤患者、15名非额叶脑损伤患者的家庭成员以及48名健康对照者完成。结果显示量表内部具有信度(内部一致性系数为0.96;分半信度为0.93)。对额叶患者损伤后与损伤前状态、与健康对照者进行效度研究,以及对额叶患者损伤前后与非额叶患者损伤前后进行比较研究,结果表明额叶损伤后的患者比(a)损伤前的额叶患者、(b)健康对照者以及(c)损伤后的非额叶患者表现出明显更多的额叶行为。FLOPS似乎在临床和研究环境中对量化额叶行为有用。

相似文献

1
Assessing frontal lobe behavioral syndromes with the frontal lobe personality scale.使用额叶人格量表评估额叶行为综合征。
Assessment. 1999 Sep;6(3):269-84. doi: 10.1177/107319119900600307.
2
Executive functions of the frontal lobes: psychometric properties of a self-rating scale.
Psychol Rep. 1995 Aug;77(1):24-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.77.1.24.
3
[The diagnosis of organic brain damage with common psychodiagnostic tests (author's transl)].用常用心理诊断测试诊断器质性脑损伤(作者译)
Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970). 1979;227(2):109-20.
4
The neurobehavioural rating scale: assessment of the behavioural sequelae of head injury by the clinician.神经行为评定量表:临床医生对头部损伤行为后遗症的评估。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987 Feb;50(2):183-93. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.50.2.183.
5
Assessment of anosognosia in persons with frontal lobe damage: clinical utility of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI).额叶损伤患者失认症的评估:梅奥-波特兰适应性量表(MPAI)的临床效用。
Brain Inj. 2005 Aug 10;19(8):599-603. doi: 10.1080/02699050400025257.
6
Long-term effects of bilateral frontal brain lesion: 60 years after injury with an iron bar.双侧额叶脑损伤的长期影响:铁棍致伤60年后
Arch Neurol. 2001 Jul;58(7):1139-42. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.7.1139.
7
[Psychopathology and criminal personality changes in patients with frontal lobe injuries].[额叶损伤患者的精神病理学与犯罪人格变化]
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz). 1990 Sep;42(9):538-50.
8
A review of rating scales for measuring behavior change due to frontal systems damage.一份关于测量额叶系统损伤所致行为改变的评定量表的综述。
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2005 Mar;18(1):18-27. doi: 10.1097/01.wnn.0000152232.47901.88.
9
Performance on the Tower of London test after severe head injury.重度颅脑损伤后伦敦塔测试的表现。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1995 Nov;1(6):537-44. doi: 10.1017/s1355617700000667.
10
Frontal-lobe cognitive dysfunction in conduct disorder adolescents.品行障碍青少年的额叶认知功能障碍
J Clin Psychol. 1990 Nov;46(6):696-706.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the neural network correlates of apathy, disinhibition, and executive dysfunction in active-duty United States Special Operations Forces.调查美国现役特种作战部队中冷漠、去抑制和执行功能障碍的神经网络相关性。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2025 Mar 18. doi: 10.1007/s11682-025-00980-4.
2
Apathy and Functional Status in Early-Stage Huntington's Disease.早期亨廷顿舞蹈病中的冷漠与功能状态
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Spring;37(2):125-130. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230225. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
3
Replication and reliability of Parkinson's disease clinical subtypes.
帕金森病临床亚型的复制和可靠性。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2024 Jul;124:107016. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2024.107016. Epub 2024 May 22.
4
Subthalamic nucleus physiology is correlated with deep brain stimulation motor and non-motor outcomes.丘脑底核生理学与深部脑刺激的运动和非运动结果相关。
Brain Commun. 2023 Oct 18;5(6):fcad268. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad268. eCollection 2023.
5
Chronic frontal neurobehavioural symptoms in combat-deployed military personnel with and without a history of blast-related mild traumatic brain injury.有和没有爆炸相关轻度创伤性脑损伤病史的战斗部署军事人员的慢性额神经行为症状。
Brain Inj. 2023 Aug 24;37(10):1127-1134. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2023.2209740. Epub 2023 May 11.
6
Neurocognitive patterns across genetic levels in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: a multiple single cases study.行为变异额颞叶痴呆中跨遗传水平的神经认知模式:一项多项单病例研究。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Dec 6;22(1):454. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02954-1.
7
Synaptic dysfunction is associated with alterations in the initiation of goal-directed behaviors: Implications for HIV-1-associated apathy.突触功能障碍与目标导向行为的启动改变有关:对 HIV-1 相关淡漠的影响。
Exp Neurol. 2022 Nov;357:114174. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.114174. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
8
Psychometric Properties of the Revised Dysexecutive Questionnaire in a Non-clinical Population.非临床人群中修订版执行功能障碍问卷的心理测量特性
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Mar 2;16:767367. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.767367. eCollection 2022.
9
Differential assessment of frontally-mediated behaviors between self- and informant-report in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder following gamma ventral capsulotomy.在进行了腹侧眶额伽马刀手术治疗后,对强迫症患者的自我报告和知情者报告的额叶介导的行为进行差异性评估。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Jun 6;170:108211. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108211. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
10
Are there distinct dimensions of apathy? The argument for reappraisal.冷漠是否存在不同的维度?重新评估的观点。
Cortex. 2022 Apr;149:246-256. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Jan 25.