Wong M D, Hollenberg J P, Charlson M E
University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, 90095-1736, USA.
Med Care. 1999 Aug;37(8):773-84. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199908000-00007.
To compare primary care and traditional Internal Medicine residents in their adherence to preventive medicine guidelines, performance in the management of chronic diseases, and utilization of resources.
Prospective cohort study.
Urban Internal Medicine residency program.
Sixteen primary care and 137 traditional Internal Medicine residents who took care of 6,307 patients (a total of 21,002 patient visits in a 1-year period).
Adherence to preventive medicine guidelines for the screening of breast cancer, cervical cancer, hypercholesterolemia, and colon cancer; admission rates among patients with asthma, chronic pulmonary disease, and diabetes mellitus; four items in the management of diabetes; and resource utilization including the costs for laboratory and radiology tests and number of consultations.
Primary care residents, as compared with traditional residents, adhered to preventive medicine guidelines for a greater proportion of their patients for the following: breast cancer among women aged 52 to 75 years (61% vs. 54%, respectively, P = 0.05); cholesterol screening among patients aged 20 to 64 years (39% vs. 33%, P = 0.007); colon cancer among patients older than 50 years (49% vs. 31%, P = 0.001); and cervical cancer among women aged 20 to 64 years (36% vs. 31%, P = 0.03). There were no differences in hospital admission rates for patients with diabetes or asthma. Total ambulatory care costs for tests, procedures, consults, and office visits were greater for patients of primary care residents ($1,045 vs. $899, P = 0.0001), although total costs per primary care visit were similar between the two patient groups.
Primary care residents more closely adhered to preventive medicine guidelines but were similar to traditional residents in their management of chronic diseases. Patients of primary care residents had greater ambulatory care costs that were not entirely attributable to greater adherence to preventive medicine guidelines.
比较初级保健住院医师和传统内科住院医师在遵循预防医学指南、慢性病管理表现及资源利用方面的情况。
前瞻性队列研究。
城市内科住院医师培训项目。
16名初级保健住院医师和137名传统内科住院医师,他们负责照料6307名患者(在1年期间共进行了21002次患者诊疗)。
遵循乳腺癌、宫颈癌、高胆固醇血症和结肠癌筛查的预防医学指南情况;哮喘、慢性肺病和糖尿病患者的住院率;糖尿病管理中的四项指标;以及资源利用情况,包括实验室检查和放射检查费用及会诊次数。
与传统住院医师相比,初级保健住院医师在以下方面为更大比例的患者遵循了预防医学指南:52至75岁女性的乳腺癌(分别为61%对54%,P = 0.05);20至64岁患者的胆固醇筛查(39%对33%,P = 0.007);50岁以上患者的结肠癌(49%对31%,P = 0.001);以及20至64岁女性的宫颈癌(36%对31%,P = 0.03)。糖尿病或哮喘患者的住院率没有差异。初级保健住院医师的患者在检查、操作、会诊和门诊就诊方面的总门诊护理费用更高(1045美元对899美元,P = 0.0001),尽管两组患者每次初级保健就诊的总费用相似。
初级保健住院医师更严格地遵循预防医学指南,但在慢性病管理方面与传统住院医师相似。初级保健住院医师的患者门诊护理费用更高,这并不完全归因于对预防医学指南的更严格遵循。