Suppr超能文献

同侧运动自动症与对侧肌张力障碍姿势的关联:一种区分内侧颞叶癫痫与新皮质颞叶癫痫的临床特征。

Association of ipsilateral motor automatisms and contralateral dystonic posturing: a clinical feature differentiating medial from neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy.

作者信息

Dupont S, Semah F, Boon P, Saint-Hilaire J M, Adam C, Broglin D, Baulac M

机构信息

Clinique Neurologique Paul Castaigne, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.

出版信息

Arch Neurol. 1999 Aug;56(8):927-32. doi: 10.1001/archneur.56.8.927.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical features that may help to differentiate medial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) from neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy (NTLE) are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the localizing and lateralizing value of the association of ipsilateral motor automatisms and contralateral dystonic posturing in patients with medically refractory temporal lobe epilepsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Videotapes of 60 patients with well-defined MTLE, NTLE, or both were reviewed to assess the presence and the localizing value of unilateral dystonic posturing associated with motor automatisms.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight of the 60 patients exhibited unilateral dystonic posturing. This sign was observed in patients with MTLE and NTLE. It was mostly contralateral to the seizure focus in patients with MTLE and exclusively ipsilateral in patients with NTLE. Unilateral motor automatisms occurred in 26 of the 60 patients with MTLE or NTLE. It was predominantly ipsilateral to the seizure focus in patients with MTLE and exclusively contralateral in patients with NTLE. The association of ipsilateral motor automatisms and contralateral dystonic posturing was found in 14 patients with MTLE but in none of the patients with NTLE. Two patients who had medial and neocortical seizure onset also exhibited this clinical feature. This association was not significantly correlated with the postoperative outcome in patients with MTLE.

CONCLUSIONS

The association of ipsilateral motor automatisms and contralateral dystonic posturing may help to differentiate MTLE from NTLE with a reliable lateralizing value. This clinical association may reflect a specific pattern in the spread of the ictal discharge.

摘要

背景

缺乏有助于区分内侧颞叶癫痫(MTLE)与新皮质颞叶癫痫(NTLE)的临床特征。

目的

探讨同侧运动自动症和对侧肌张力障碍姿势联合出现对药物难治性颞叶癫痫患者的定位和定侧价值。

患者与方法

回顾60例明确诊断为MTLE、NTLE或两者皆有的患者的录像,以评估与运动自动症相关的单侧肌张力障碍姿势的存在情况及其定位价值。

结果

60例患者中有28例出现单侧肌张力障碍姿势。该体征在MTLE和NTLE患者中均有观察到。在MTLE患者中,它大多与癫痫病灶对侧,而在NTLE患者中则完全与同侧。60例MTLE或NTLE患者中有26例出现单侧运动自动症。在MTLE患者中,它主要与癫痫病灶同侧,而在NTLE患者中则完全与对侧。14例MTLE患者中发现同侧运动自动症和对侧肌张力障碍姿势联合出现,而NTLE患者中无一例出现。2例有内侧和新皮质癫痫发作起始的患者也表现出这一临床特征。这种联合出现与MTLE患者的术后结果无显著相关性。

结论

同侧运动自动症和对侧肌张力障碍姿势联合出现可能有助于将MTLE与NTLE区分开来,具有可靠的定侧价值。这种临床联合可能反映了发作期放电传播的一种特定模式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验