Hoeger K M, Guzick D S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester School of Medicine, NY 14642, USA.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Sep;42(3):611-9. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199909000-00015.
The challenge of creating a satisfactory classification of endometriosis remains to be answered. The ability of the current classification schemes to predict pregnancy outcome or to aid in the management of pelvic pain is recognized to be inadequate. Further revisions of the current classification scheme are anticipated as the understanding of how endometriosis contributes to infertility and pelvic pain evolves. In any revision of the classification system, use of empirically derived weights and breakpoints to define disease stages based on outcome data in larger clinical trials should be attempted. It is also possible that additional factors such as CA-125 level or lesion characteristics may be shown to play an important role in prognosis. If so, these will need to be accounted for in the classification scheme. Careful and consistent use of the recommendations of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis subcommittee should allow for collection of data for use in further revisions. It is quite possible that a classification scheme that is designed to predict outcome with respect to pregnancy may be totally inadequate in assessing patients who have endometriosis and pelvic pain. Factors found to be important in the assessment of pelvic pain may be different from those involved with the pathophysiology of endometriosis and infertility. The AFS form suggested for use in the management of endometriosis in the presence of pelvic pain allows for recording of variables such as depth of invasion, histology, as well as documenting adjunct investigations and preoperative physical findings. Such prospective data collection and review in large centers may provide a large clinical base from which to derive empirical point scores and breakpoints in a classification scheme.
创建一个令人满意的子宫内膜异位症分类方法的挑战仍有待解决。目前的分类方案在预测妊娠结局或辅助治疗盆腔疼痛方面的能力被认为是不足的。随着对子宫内膜异位症如何导致不孕和盆腔疼痛的认识不断发展,预计将对当前的分类方案进行进一步修订。在对分类系统的任何修订中,都应尝试使用基于大型临床试验结果数据通过经验得出的权重和断点来定义疾病阶段。也有可能诸如CA-125水平或病变特征等其他因素在预后中发挥重要作用。如果是这样,这些因素将需要在分类方案中予以考虑。仔细且一致地应用美国生殖医学学会子宫内膜异位症分类小组委员会的建议,应有助于收集数据以供进一步修订使用。很有可能一个旨在预测妊娠结局的分类方案在评估患有子宫内膜异位症和盆腔疼痛的患者时可能完全不够用。在评估盆腔疼痛中发现重要的因素可能与涉及子宫内膜异位症和不孕病理生理学的因素不同。建议用于伴有盆腔疼痛的子宫内膜异位症管理的AFS表格允许记录诸如浸润深度、组织学等变量,以及记录辅助检查和术前体格检查结果。在大型中心进行这样的前瞻性数据收集和审查可能会提供一个庞大的临床基础,从中得出分类方案中的经验性评分和断点。