Warf B C, Donnelly M B, Schwartz R W, Sloan D A
Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40536, USA.
J Surg Res. 1999 Sep;86(1):29-35. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1999.5690.
It is reasonable to propose that competence is a multifaceted characteristic defined in part by some minimum level of knowledge and skill. In this study we examined the relationship between surgical faculty's judgment of clinical competence, as measured by a surgical resident objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), and the residents' objective performance on the skills being tested.
Fifty-six general surgery residents at all levels of training participated in a 30-station OSCE. At the completion of each station, the faculty proctor made several overall judgments regarding each resident's performance, including a global judgment of competent or not competent. The competence judgment was applied to the objective percentage performance score in three different ways to construct methods for determining competence based solely upon this objective percentage score.
The average mean competent score (MCS) across the stations was 61%, and the average mean noncompetent score (MNCS) was 38%. The difference between MCS and MNCS for each station was very consistent. Upper threshold scores above which a judgment of competent was always made, and lower threshold scores below which a judgment of noncompetent was always made were observed. Overall, the average mean and threshold scores for competent and noncompetent groups were remarkably similar. For performance scores in the range between the threshold competent and noncompetent scores at each station, measures other than objective performance on the skills being evaluated determined the judgment of competent or not competent.
Empirically determined minimum acceptable standards for objective performance in clinical skills and knowledge appeared to have been subconsciously applied to the competence judgment by the faculty evaluators in this study. Other factors appeared to have become determinate when the objective performance score fell within a range of uncertainty.
有理由认为,能力是一个多方面的特征,部分由某种最低水平的知识和技能来定义。在本研究中,我们考察了外科教员对临床能力的判断(通过外科住院医师客观结构化临床考试[OSCE]来衡量)与住院医师在被测试技能上的客观表现之间的关系。
56名处于不同培训阶段的普通外科住院医师参加了一场有30个考站的OSCE。在每个考站结束时,监考教员对每位住院医师的表现做出了几项总体判断,包括对是否具备能力的总体判断。能力判断以三种不同方式应用于客观百分比表现分数,以构建仅基于该客观百分比分数来确定能力的方法。
各考站的平均合格分数(MCS)为61%,平均不合格分数(MNCS)为38%。每个考站的MCS与MNCS之间的差异非常一致。观察到总是做出合格判断的上阈值分数,以及总是做出不合格判断的下阈值分数。总体而言,合格组和不合格组的平均分数和阈值分数非常相似。对于每个考站处于合格和不合格阈值分数之间范围内的表现分数,除了所评估技能的客观表现之外的其他因素决定了是否合格的判断。
在本研究中,教员评估者似乎已下意识地将根据经验确定的临床技能和知识客观表现的最低可接受标准应用于能力判断。当客观表现分数落在不确定范围内时,其他因素似乎变得具有决定性。