Goedhart B, Brand G J, Reiber J H
Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), The Netherlands.
Int J Card Imaging. 1998 Oct;14(5):317-22. doi: 10.1023/a:1006025826795.
Digital acquisition systems are widely used nowadays. The digitization of the cath lab environment is now directed towards the change in the exchange media from an analog (i.e. cinefilm) to a digital (i.e. CD-R) medium. An important consequence of this development is the need for another type of review system. This article focuses on the replacement of the cineprojector by a digital equivalent: the DICOM review station. Since the technologies differ fundamentally, the DICOM review station has very little in common with its analog predecessor. This article explains the basics of DICOM review stations. Different approaches, both in hardware and in software, are possible, each showing their advantages and drawbacks. The impact of choices made by the industry will be illustrated by a number of commercially available DICOM review stations. Further, the article discusses the topics of diagnostic image quality and performance. In our opinion, these are the major topics when it comes to an objective comparison of the capabilities of DICOM review stations. The relation of these subjects with design choices in terms of hardware and software are discussed.
如今,数字采集系统被广泛使用。导管室环境的数字化目前正朝着将交换介质从模拟(即电影胶片)转变为数字(即CD-R)介质的方向发展。这一发展的一个重要结果是需要另一种类型的审查系统。本文重点介绍用数字等效设备取代电影放映机:DICOM审查站。由于技术存在根本差异,DICOM审查站与其模拟前身几乎没有共同之处。本文解释了DICOM审查站的基础知识。在硬件和软件方面都有不同的方法,每种方法都有其优缺点。一些商用DICOM审查站将说明行业所做选择的影响。此外,本文还讨论了诊断图像质量和性能的主题。我们认为,在对DICOM审查站的能力进行客观比较时,这些是主要主题。还讨论了这些主题与硬件和软件设计选择之间的关系。