Suppr超能文献

通过动态血压监测诊断白大衣高血压

Diagnosis of white coat hypertension by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

作者信息

Owens P, Atkins N, O'Brien E

机构信息

Blood Pressure Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Hypertension. 1999 Aug;34(2):267-72. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.34.2.267.

Abstract

White coat hypertension (WCH) is common in referred hypertensive patients. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is not free from the white coat syndrome. We examined the use of the elevation of the first and last measurements of ABPM for diagnosis of WCH in a hypertensive population that had been referred to a hospital-based hypertension unit. Data were obtained on 1350 patients for clinic and ABPM parameters. WCH, as diagnosed by conventional clinic blood pressure (BP) measurement, was compared with a variety of alternative methods determined from ABPM. In all cases, mean daytime pressure was <135 mm Hg/85 mm Hg with an elevation of clinic BP >/=140 mm Hg systolic or 90 mm Hg diastolic. The definitions tested for this elevation were first hour mean pressure, first reading, maximum reading in first hour, last hour mean pressure, last reading, maximum reading in the last hour and maximum reading in first or last hour. Elevation of the maximum pressure in the first hour or last hour above 140 mm Hg systolic or 90 mm Hg diastolic showed a high level of agreement (kappa=0.91) with classical WCH for diagnosis of the white coat syndrome. Termed ambulatory white coat hypertension, patients with this finding were older than classic white coat patients and had higher daytime (127+/-6/78+/-5 mm Hg versus 121+/-5.5/74+/-6 mm Hg, P<0.005 for systolic and diastolic) and nighttime (114+/-11/67+/-8 mm Hg versus 106+/-9/61+/-6 mm Hg, P<0.005 for systolic and diastolic) pressures. They also had a significantly greater Sokolow-Lyon index (leads V(1)+V(5), 21+/-7 mV versus 18+/-6 mV). Elevation of BP above 140 mm Hg systolic or 90 mm Hg diastolic in the first or last hour of monitoring diagnoses patients with a white coat response in whom there is a higher BP profile than in patients with classic white coat response alone. We suggest, therefore, that this is a better measure of the white coat phenomenon.

摘要

白大衣高血压(WCH)在转诊的高血压患者中很常见。动态血压监测(ABPM)也不能避免白大衣综合征。我们在一个转诊至医院高血压科的高血压人群中,研究了利用ABPM首次和末次测量值升高来诊断WCH的情况。获取了1350例患者的临床和ABPM参数数据。将通过传统临床血压(BP)测量诊断的WCH与从ABPM确定的各种替代方法进行比较。在所有病例中,日间平均血压<135 mmHg/85 mmHg,且临床收缩压BP升高≥140 mmHg或舒张压升高≥90 mmHg。针对这种升高情况测试的定义包括首小时平均血压、首次读数、首小时最高读数、末小时平均血压、末次读数、末小时最高读数以及首小时或末小时最高读数。首小时或末小时收缩压高于140 mmHg或舒张压高于90 mmHg的升高情况与经典WCH在诊断白大衣综合征方面具有高度一致性(kappa = 0.91)。被称为动态白大衣高血压的这类患者比经典白大衣患者年龄更大,日间(127±6/78±5 mmHg对121±5.5/74±6 mmHg,收缩压和舒张压P<0.005)和夜间(114±11/67±8 mmHg对106±9/61±6 mmHg,收缩压和舒张压P<0.005)血压更高。他们的索科洛 - 里昂指数(V(1)+V(5)导联,21±7 mV对18±6 mV)也显著更高。在监测的首小时或末小时收缩压高于140 mmHg或舒张压高于90 mmHg可诊断出具有白大衣反应的患者,这类患者的血压水平高于仅具有经典白大衣反应的患者。因此,我们认为这是对白大衣现象更好的衡量指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验