Martino R, Romero P, Subirá M, Bellido M, Altés A, Sureda A, Brunet S, Badell I, Cubells J, Sierra J
Division of Clinical Hematology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999 Aug;24(3):283-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701899.
Acute graft-versus-host disease (AGVHD) severity is usually graded (grades 0-IV) by the pattern of organ involvement using the classic Glucksberg-Seattle criteria (GSC). Recently, the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) developed a new Severity Index by regrouping the patterns of organ involvement into five Indexes (0-D) that appeared more predictive of transplant-related mortality (TRM) and transplant failure (TF, relapse or TRM). We studied the predictive value of both grading systems of TRM, TF and GVHD-related mortality (GTRM) in a series of 114 consecutive patients > or = 12 years old allografted from a histocompatible sibling at our institution, 100 of whom were evaluable for AGVHD. The IBMTR Severity Index showed better incremental prediction of TRM (relative risks (RR) of 1, 1.5, 1.4, 2 and 2.5 for Indexes 0, A, B, C and D), TF (RRs of 1, 1.6, 1.6, 2 and 2.3, respectively) and GTRM (RRs of 1, 2.2 and 4.8 for Indexes B, C and D) than the GSC. With the GSC different outcomes for TRM and TF were found only from grade 0 to I-II and 0 to IV or I-III to IV, but not from I-II to III. The GSC also appeared less predictive of GTRM (RRs of 1, 0.4 and 2.9 for grades II, III and IV). In our relatively small patient sample, the new IBMTR Severity Index appeared more predictive of transplant outcome than the GSC, especially between no AGVHD, early Indexes (A-B) and advanced Indexes (C-D).
急性移植物抗宿主病(AGVHD)的严重程度通常根据器官受累模式,采用经典的格鲁克斯伯格 - 西雅图标准(GSC)进行分级(0 - IV级)。最近,国际骨髓移植登记处(IBMTR)通过将器官受累模式重新分组为五个指数(0 - D),制定了一种新的严重程度指数,这些指数似乎更能预测移植相关死亡率(TRM)和移植失败(TF,复发或TRM)。我们在我们机构对114例年龄≥12岁、接受来自组织相容性同胞的同种异体移植的连续患者进行了研究,以探讨这两种分级系统对TRM、TF和移植物抗宿主病相关死亡率(GTRM)的预测价值,其中100例患者可评估AGVHD。IBMTR严重程度指数对TRM(指数0、A、B、C和D的相对风险(RR)分别为1、1.5、1.4、2和2.5)、TF(RR分别为1、1.6、1.6、2和2.3)和GTRM(指数B、C和D的RR分别为1、2.2和4.8)的增量预测比GSC更好。使用GSC时,仅在0至I - II级以及0至IV级或I - III至IV级发现TRM和TF的不同结果,但在I - II至III级未发现。GSC对GTRM的预测性也较低(II级、III级和IV级的RR分别为1、0.4和2.9)。在我们相对较小的患者样本中,新的IBMTR严重程度指数似乎比GSC更能预测移植结果,尤其是在无AGVHD、早期指数(A - B)和晚期指数(C - D)之间。