Karlström K, Essén-Gustavsson B, Hoppeler H, Straub R, Weishaupt M
Department of Medicine and Surgery, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Acta Anat (Basel). 1992;145(4):395-9. doi: 10.1159/000147396.
In order to investigate possible differences in variables defining capillary supply of skeletal muscle derived from two methods, the electron-microscopical and the amylase-PAS histochemical methods were applied in a study of horse and steer muscles. Samples from several locomoter muscles were taken at slaughter from one horse and one steer, divided into two and prepared separately for the two techniques. It was found that there was no difference between the two methods in the values for the capillary-to-fibre ratio. Values for mean fibre area, on the other hand, were significantly higher in the histochemically treated samples (16%, p = 0.001) and hence capillary density values lower (12%, p = 0.002). It was concluded that the two methods are comparable in their capacity to visualize capillaries, but preparation of samples for electron microscopy produces an average shrinkage of 16% of muscle fibres. As a consequence capillary density is overestimated accordingly. Discrepancies were larger for steer than horse muscles.
为了研究通过两种方法(电子显微镜法和淀粉酶-过碘酸雪夫氏组织化学法)定义的骨骼肌毛细血管供应变量可能存在的差异,在一项针对马和牛肌肉的研究中应用了这两种方法。在屠宰时从一匹马和一头牛身上采集几块运动肌肉的样本,将其分成两份并分别用两种技术进行制备。结果发现,两种方法在毛细血管与纤维比例的值上没有差异。另一方面,组织化学处理样本中的平均纤维面积值显著更高(16%,p = 0.001),因此毛细血管密度值更低(12%,p = 0.002)。得出的结论是,两种方法在可视化毛细血管的能力方面具有可比性,但用于电子显微镜检查的样本制备会使肌肉纤维平均收缩16%。因此,毛细血管密度相应地被高估。牛肌肉的差异比马肌肉的更大。