• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险模型估计与应用中的总体选择和变量选择

Population choice and variable selection in the estimation and application of risk models.

作者信息

Dudley R A, Rennie D J, Luft H S

机构信息

Institute for Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

Inquiry. 1999 Summer;36(2):200-11.

PMID:10459374
Abstract

This paper shows that risk adjustment models based on demographic and employment variables are not easily transferable from one population to the next, and that administrative variables are not useful in predicting medical expenditures. We found statistically significant differences between models built on populations of employees from a single employer enrolled in two different health plans, and between models built on populations of enrollees from a single health plan employed at two different companies. Employment-based variables (e.g., length of employment) had little predictive power in any of these risk models. We conclude that policymakers should be careful in applying risk models across populations, and that future versions of risk models for use within large employers need not include employment-based variables.

摘要

本文表明,基于人口统计学和就业变量的风险调整模型不易从一个人群转移到另一个人群,且行政变量在预测医疗支出方面并无用处。我们发现,基于参加两种不同健康计划的单一雇主的员工人群构建的模型之间,以及基于在两家不同公司工作的单一健康计划参保人群构建的模型之间,存在统计学上的显著差异。基于就业的变量(如就业时长)在任何这些风险模型中几乎没有预测能力。我们得出结论,政策制定者在跨人群应用风险模型时应谨慎,且大型雇主内部使用的风险模型的未来版本无需纳入基于就业的变量。

相似文献

1
Population choice and variable selection in the estimation and application of risk models.风险模型估计与应用中的总体选择和变量选择
Inquiry. 1999 Summer;36(2):200-11.
2
A method for risk-adjusting employer contributions to competing health insurance plans.一种对雇主向竞争性医疗保险计划的缴费进行风险调整的方法。
Inquiry. 1991 Summer;28(2):107-16.
3
Risk adjustment of mental health and substance abuse payments.心理健康与药物滥用支付的风险调整
Inquiry. 1998 Summer;35(2):223-39.
4
Assessing health plan case mix in employed populations: ambulatory morbidity and prescribed drug models.
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 1991;12:197-232.
5
Simulating the effects of employer contributions on adverse selection and health plan choice.模拟雇主缴费对逆向选择和健康保险计划选择的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Oct;34(4):813-37.
6
Evaluation of the effect of a consumer-driven health plan on medical care expenditures and utilization.评估消费者驱动型健康计划对医疗保健支出和使用的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 2):1189-210. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00282.x.
7
Risk adjustment alternatives in paying for behavioral health care under Medicaid.医疗补助计划下行为健康护理付费中的风险调整替代方案。
Health Serv Res. 2001 Aug;36(4):793-811.
8
The magnitude and nature of risk selection in employer-sponsored health plans.雇主赞助的健康计划中风险选择的规模和性质。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec;39(6 Pt 1):1817-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00320.x.
9
Effect of premium, copayments, and health status on the choice of health plans.保费、共付额和健康状况对健康保险计划选择的影响。
Med Care. 2008 Oct;46(10):1033-40. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318185cdac.
10
Assessing health plan case mix in employed populations: self-reported health status models.
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 1991;12:233-72.