Suppr超能文献

犬经气管内与支气管内给药后阿托品的药代动力学和药效学

Atropine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics following endotracheal versus endobronchial administration in dogs.

作者信息

Paret G, Mazkereth R, Sella R, Almog S, Mayan H, Lotan D, Ben-Abraham R, Barzilay Z, Ezra D

机构信息

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 1999 Jun;41(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(99)00031-3.

Abstract

Emergency endotracheal and endobronchial drug administration provide an effective alternative for intravenous drug delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The purpose of the present study was to determine the immediate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of atropine following administration by either of these routes. Atropine (0.02 mg/kg) was given to seven anaesthetized mongrel dogs. Each dog was studied twice: once when atropine was injected into the endotracheal tube, and on another day when atropine was given via a flexible catheter wedged into a peripheral bronchus. Plasma atropine concentrations and blood gases were measured during 60 min following drug administration. Both routes of atropine administration differed significantly in three measures: the maximal atropine concentration (Cmax) was significantly higher with the endobronchial administration 40.0 +/- 7.8 ng/ml compared to 23.9 +/- 5 ng/ml endotracheally (P = 0.008); atropine's elimination (t1/2beta) half-life was significantly longer with the endobronchial route (39.3 +/- 5.2 min vs. 28.0 +/- 7.9 min; P = 0.05); Endobronchial administration resulted in an increase of 16% in heart rate, beginning immediately after drug delivery and peaking after 5 min. Other pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different. We conclude that endobronchial administration of atropine has a clear advantage over the endotracheal route.

摘要

在心肺复苏期间,紧急气管内和支气管内给药为静脉给药提供了一种有效的替代方法。本研究的目的是确定通过这两种途径给药后阿托品的即时药代动力学和药效学特性。给7只麻醉的杂种犬给予阿托品(0.02mg/kg)。每只犬进行两次研究:一次是将阿托品注入气管内导管时,另一次是在另一天通过插入外周支气管的柔性导管给予阿托品时。给药后60分钟内测量血浆阿托品浓度和血气。阿托品的两种给药途径在三个指标上有显著差异:支气管内给药的最大阿托品浓度(Cmax)显著更高,为40.0±7.8ng/ml,而气管内给药为23.9±5ng/ml(P = 0.008);支气管内给药途径中阿托品的消除(t1/2β)半衰期显著更长(39.3±5.2分钟对28.0±7.9分钟;P = 0.05);支气管内给药导致心率立即增加16%,给药后立即开始并在5分钟后达到峰值。其他药代动力学参数无显著差异。我们得出结论,支气管内给予阿托品比气管内途径具有明显优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验