Mera F, DeLurgio D B, Patterson R E, Merlino J D, Wade M E, León A R
Carlyle Fraser Heart Center, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Aug;22(8):1234-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00606.x.
This study compares LV performance during high right ventricular septal (RVS) and apical (RVA) pacing in patients with LV dysfunction who underwent His-bundle ablation for chronic AF. We inserted a passive fixation pacing electrode into the RVA and an active fixation electrode in the RVS. A dual chamber, rate responsive pulse generator stimulated the RVA through the ventricular port and the RVS via the atrial port. Patients were randomized to initial RVA (VVIR) or RVS (AAIR) pacing for 2 months. The pacing site was reversed during the next 2 months. At the 2 and 4 month follow-up visit, each patient underwent a transthoracic echocardiographical study and a rest/exercise first pass radionuclide ventriculogram. We studied nine men and three women (mean age of 68 +/- 7 years) with congestive heart failure functional Class (NYHA Classification): I (3 patients), II (7 patients), and III (2 patients). The QRS duration was shorter during RVS stimulation (158 +/- 10 vs 170 +/- 11 ms, P < 0.001). Chronic capture threshold and lead impedance did not significantly differ. LV fractional shortening improved during RVS pacing (0.31 +/- 0.05 vs 0.26 +/- 0.07, P < 0.01). RVS activation increased the resting first pass LV ejection fraction (0.51 +/- 0.14 vs 0.43 +/- 0.10, P < 0.01). No significant difference was observed during RVS and RVA pacing in the exercise time (5.6 +/- 3.2 vs 5.4 +/- 3.1, P = 0.6) or the exercise first pass LV ejection fraction (0.58 +/- 0.15 vs 0.55 +/- 0.16, P = 0.2). The relative changes in QRS duration and LV ejection fraction at both pacing sites showed a significant correlation (P < 0.01). We conclude that RVS pacing produces shorter QRS duration and better chronic LV function than RVA pacing in patients with mild to moderate LV dysfunction and chronic AF after His-bundle ablation.
本研究比较了在因慢性房颤接受希氏束消融术的左心室功能不全患者中,高位右心室间隔(RVS)起搏和心尖部(RVA)起搏时左心室的性能。我们将一根被动固定起搏电极插入RVA,并将一根主动固定电极置于RVS。一个双腔、频率应答式脉冲发生器通过心室端口刺激RVA,通过心房端口刺激RVS。患者被随机分为初始RVA(VVIR)或RVS(AAIR)起搏2个月。在接下来的2个月内,起搏部位互换。在第2个月和第4个月的随访时,每位患者均接受经胸超声心动图检查以及静息/运动首次通过放射性核素心室造影。我们研究了9名男性和3名女性(平均年龄68±7岁),其充血性心力衰竭功能分级(纽约心脏协会分级)为:I级(3例患者)、II级(7例患者)和III级(2例患者)。在RVS刺激期间,QRS时限较短(158±10 vs 170±11毫秒,P<0.001)。慢性捕获阈值和导线阻抗无显著差异。在RVS起搏期间,左心室缩短分数有所改善(0.31±0.05 vs 0.26±0.07,P<0.01)。RVS激动增加了静息时首次通过左心室射血分数(0.51±0.14 vs 0.43±0.10,P<0.01)。在RVS和RVA起搏期间,运动时间(5.6±3.2 vs 5.4±3.1,P=0.6)或运动时首次通过左心室射血分数(0.58±0.15 vs 0.55±0.16,P=0.2)未观察到显著差异。两个起搏部位的QRS时限和左心室射血分数的相对变化显示出显著相关性(P<0.01)。我们得出结论,对于轻度至中度左心室功能不全且在希氏束消融术后患有慢性房颤的患者,RVS起搏比RVA起搏产生更短的QRS时限和更好的慢性左心室功能。