Richards J R, Christman C A
Division of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento 95817, USA.
Eur J Emerg Med. 1999 Jun;6(2):129-33. doi: 10.1097/00063110-199906000-00009.
Intravenous urography (IVU) is a useful radiographic study in the detection of renal and ureteral calculi. However, it is time consuming, expensive, and exposes the patient to i.v. contrast and radiation. To determine the impact of utilizing IVU less for the detection of renal calculi, criteria for ordering IVU in the emergency department (ED) were evaluated, and patients with high probability of positive IVU were identified. Variables included presence of acute flank pain with haematuria, prior history of renal calculus, degree of haematuria, and uncontrolled pain. We reviewed patients presenting with acute flank and abdominal pain with haematuria from May 1995 to May 1996 at a large urban university hospital. Charts were abstracted for prior history, reason for ordering IVU, time in the ED, laboratory results, IVU result, final diagnosis, and disposition. Data was analysed with Student's t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. A total of 302 patients were identified, and 185 underwent IVU during the study period. For patients with prior history of renal calculi 82% had positive IVU (sensitivity 51%, specificity 87%). For patients with both acute flank pain and haematuria, 92% had a positive IVU (sensitivity 93%, specificity 43%), and 19% of patients with abdominal pain of unclear aetiology with haematuria had a positive IVU. All patients with uncontrolled pain had evidence of high-grade obstruction on IVU. Degree of haematuria was not predictive of a positive IVU from ROC curve derivation. IVU is a useful study in the ED but may be overutilized, leading to lengthy patient stays. The combined objective findings of acute flank pain and haematuria are sensitive, and prior history is specific in identifying patients with renal calculi. Degree of haematuria was not useful in predicting renal calculi. By utilizing the criteria of acute flank pain and haematuria as a decision aid, 66% of all IVUs ordered could have been avoided.
静脉肾盂造影(IVU)是检测肾和输尿管结石的一项有用的放射学检查。然而,它耗时、昂贵,且会使患者接受静脉造影剂和辐射。为了确定减少使用IVU检测肾结石的影响,我们评估了急诊科(ED)开具IVU的标准,并识别出IVU阳性可能性高的患者。变量包括伴有血尿的急性胁腹痛、既往肾结石病史、血尿程度和无法控制的疼痛。我们回顾了1995年5月至1996年5月在一家大型城市大学医院就诊的伴有急性胁腹和腹痛及血尿的患者。提取病历中的既往病史、开具IVU的原因、在急诊科的时间、实验室检查结果、IVU结果、最终诊断和处置情况。数据采用学生t检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验及受试者工作特征(ROC)分析。共识别出302例患者,其中185例在研究期间接受了IVU检查。有既往肾结石病史的患者中,82%的IVU结果为阳性(敏感性51%,特异性87%)。同时有急性胁腹痛和血尿的患者中,92%的IVU结果为阳性(敏感性93%,特异性43%),19%病因不明的腹痛伴血尿患者IVU结果为阳性。所有疼痛无法控制的患者在IVU检查中均有重度梗阻的证据。从ROC曲线推导来看,血尿程度不能预测IVU阳性。IVU在急诊科是一项有用的检查,但可能存在过度使用的情况,导致患者住院时间延长。急性胁腹痛和血尿这两个客观综合表现具有敏感性,既往病史在识别肾结石患者方面具有特异性。血尿程度对预测肾结石并无帮助。通过将急性胁腹痛和血尿的标准作为决策辅助依据,可避免66%的IVU检查。