• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可实现的护理基准:基准测试的基础知识。

Achievable benchmarks of care: the ABCs of benchmarking.

作者信息

Weissman N W, Allison J J, Kiefe C I, Farmer R M, Weaver M T, Williams O D, Child I G, Pemberton J H, Brown K C, Baker C S

机构信息

Center for Outcomes and Effectiveness Research and Education (COERE), University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 1999 Aug;5(3):269-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00203.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00203.x
PMID:10461579
Abstract

Benchmarking is generally considered to be an important tool for quality improvement. Traditional approaches to benchmarking have relied on subjective identification of 'leaders in the field'. We derive an objective, reproducible and attainable Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC) by measuring and analysing performance on process-of-care indicators. Three characteristics of the ABC that we deem essential are: (1) benchmarks represent a measurable level of excellence; (2) benchmarks are demonstrably attainable; (3) benchmarks are derived from data in an objective, reproducible and predetermined fashion. From these characteristics it follows that (4) providers with high performance are selected to define a level of excellence in a predetermined fashion, but (5) providers with high performance on small numbers of cases do not influence unduly benchmark levels. We use the 'pared mean' to operationalize the ABC. Roughly, the pared mean summarizes the performance of top-ranked providers whereby at least 10% of the patient pool across all providers is included. Bayesian estimators for adjustment of performance of providers with small sample sizes are used to rank providers. Randomized controlled trials to assess the independent effect of the ABC in quality improvement projects are under way. We have developed a methodology objectively and reproducibly to derive a level of excellent, attainable performance, based on measured performance by a group of providers. The ABC can be applied to groups of providers in communities, to institutions and departments within them, or to individual practitioners.

摘要

标杆管理通常被认为是质量改进的重要工具。传统的标杆管理方法依赖于主观确定“该领域的领导者”。我们通过衡量和分析护理过程指标的表现,得出一个客观、可重复且可实现的护理可及标杆(ABC)。我们认为ABC的三个基本特征是:(1)标杆代表可衡量的卓越水平;(2)标杆显然是可实现的;(3)标杆以客观、可重复且预先确定的方式从数据中得出。从这些特征可以得出:(4)选择表现出色的提供者以预先确定的方式定义卓越水平,但(5)在少数病例上表现出色的提供者不会过度影响标杆水平。我们使用“剔除均值”来实施ABC。大致来说,剔除均值总结了排名靠前的提供者的表现,其中包括所有提供者中至少10%的患者群体。使用贝叶斯估计量来调整样本量小的提供者的表现,以便对提供者进行排名。评估ABC在质量改进项目中的独立效果的随机对照试验正在进行中。我们已经开发出一种方法,基于一组提供者的测量表现,客观且可重复地得出卓越且可实现的表现水平。ABC可应用于社区中的提供者群体、其中的机构和部门,或个体从业者。

相似文献

1
Achievable benchmarks of care: the ABCs of benchmarking.可实现的护理基准:基准测试的基础知识。
J Eval Clin Pract. 1999 Aug;5(3):269-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00203.x.
2
Identifying achievable benchmarks of care: concepts and methodology.
Int J Qual Health Care. 1998 Oct;10(5):443-7. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/10.5.443.
3
Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback: a randomized controlled trial.利用可实现的基准进行医生反馈以改善质量改进:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2001 Jun 13;285(22):2871-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.22.2871.
4
Level of appropriate primary diabetic eyecare delivered and achievable in optometry practices in Australia.澳大利亚视光实践中提供和可实现的适当初级糖尿病眼病护理水平。
Clin Exp Optom. 2023 Apr;106(3):276-282. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2022.2033107. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
5
Achievable benchmarks of care for primary care quality indicators in a practice-based research network.基于实践的研究网络中初级保健质量指标的可实现护理基准。
Am J Med Qual. 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):39-46. doi: 10.1177/1062860607310774.
6
Benchmarking patient outcomes.对患者治疗结果进行基准比对。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2001;33(2):185-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00185.x.
7
Establishing achievable benchmarks for quality improvement in systemic therapy for early-stage breast cancer.确立早期乳腺癌全身治疗质量改进的可实现基准。
Cancer. 2017 Oct 1;123(19):3772-3780. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30804. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
8
Improving surgical outcomes through benchmarking.通过基准测试提高手术效果。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(1):59-64. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10976. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
9
Establishing benchmarks for the hospitalized care of children with asthma, bronchiolitis, and pneumonia.建立儿童哮喘、细支气管炎和肺炎住院治疗的基准。
Pediatrics. 2014 Sep;134(3):555-62. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1052.
10
Statistical benchmarks for process measures of quality of care for mental and substance use disorders.精神和物质使用障碍护理质量过程指标的统计基准
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Oct;57(10):1461-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.10.1461.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating the causal effect of a quality assurance program on quality of care in Germany.评估德国质量保证计划对医疗质量的因果效应。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jun 9;25(1):815. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12939-8.
2
Adherence to "Choosing Wisely" Recommendations in Pediatric Emergency Medicine.儿科急诊医学中对“明智选择”建议的遵循情况。
Ann Emerg Med. 2025 Jul;86(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.02.004. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
3
Benchmarks for low back pain in general practice in Flanders: electronic audit of INTEGO.弗拉芒地区全科医疗中腰痛的基准:INTEGO电子审计
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Dec 20;25(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02644-6.
4
Setting standards in residential aged care: identifying achievable benchmarks of care for long-term aged care services.制定老年住宅护理标准:确定长期老年护理服务可实现的护理基准。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Dec 10;36(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae105.
5
Precision feedback: A conceptual model.精准反馈:一个概念模型。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Apr 9;8(3):e10419. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10419. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Exploring Anesthesia Provider Preferences for Precision Feedback: Preference Elicitation Study.探索麻醉师对精准反馈的偏好:偏好 elicitation 研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Jun 11;10:e54071. doi: 10.2196/54071.
7
Audit and feedback to reduce unwarranted clinical variation at scale: a realist study of implementation strategy mechanisms.审核和反馈以大规模减少不必要的临床差异:实施策略机制的真实研究。
Implement Sci. 2023 Dec 11;18(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01324-w.
8
Real-life benchmarking bladder cancer care: A population-based study.现实生活中膀胱癌护理的基准研究:一项基于人群的研究。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2023 Aug;17(8):268-273. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8231.
9
Benchmarking outcomes for distal pancreatectomy: critical evaluation of four multicenter studies.远端胰腺切除术的基准测试结果:对四项多中心研究的批判性评估。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jun 29;408(1):253. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02972-8.
10
Engagement is a necessary condition to test audit and feedback design features: results of a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial with an embedded process evaluation.参与是测试审计和反馈设计特征的必要条件:一项实用的、多因素、集群随机试验的结果,其中嵌入了一个过程评估。
Implement Sci. 2023 May 10;18(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01271-6.