• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Research fundamentals VI: misconduct in biomedical research.

作者信息

Biros M H, Fish S S, Taggart P

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55415, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Aug;6(8):840-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb01218.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb01218.x
PMID:10463558
Abstract

The goal of medical research is the acquisition and application of new knowledge for the benefit of individual patients and society as a whole. Achieving this goal requires excellence in scientific methodology, honesty in data collection and interpretation, and realistic assessment of the implications of the findings. Underlying all steps in the acquisition of new knowledge is the absolute need for application of the highest ethical standards for research. Occasionally, ethical principles of research are breached because of lack of understanding or the carelessness of researchers. However, researchers have the obligation to know and apply basic principles of research ethics in order to avoid, prevent, or recognize deviations from ethical scientific behavior. When intentional violations of the principles of ethical research occur, the impact to the scientific and lay community can be profound. Misconduct can be prevented if the ethical principles of research are understood and consistently applied. This paper describes the sources and detection of misconduct in the production of science in order to provide emergency researchers with the knowledge needed to prevent misconduct from occurring at all.

摘要

相似文献

1
Research fundamentals VI: misconduct in biomedical research.
Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Aug;6(8):840-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb01218.x.
2
Changing guidelines on conflict of interest.关于利益冲突的不断变化的指导方针。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 May;37(6):1749-50. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01295-5.
3
An ethical analysis of the phenomenon of misconduct in research.对研究中的不当行为现象的伦理分析。
Acta Oncol. 1999;38(1):107-10. doi: 10.1080/028418699431889.
4
Research ethics in emergency medicine.急诊医学中的研究伦理
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1999 May;17(2):461-74, xii. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8627(05)70072-9.
5
Dealing with misconduct in biomedical research: a review of the problems and the proposed methods for improvement.处理生物医学研究中的不当行为:问题综述及改进方法探讨。
Account Res. 2009 Nov;16(6):307-30. doi: 10.1080/08989620903328576.
6
Beyond conflict of interest: the responsible conduct of research.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2002 Jul;8(3):459-68. doi: 10.1007/s11948-002-0068-4.
7
[Misconduct in clinical scientific investigations].[临床科学研究中的不当行为]
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2004;66(5-6):335-41.
8
The proper conduct of research.研究的正确开展。
Avian Dis. 2007 Mar;51(1):1-7. doi: 10.1637/0005-2086(2007)051[0001:TPCOR]2.0.CO;2.
9
Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.促进研究成果发表中的道德行为。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2008 Summer;26(2):89-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3466.2008.00045.x.
10
The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.科学研究的伦理:对科学家和机构代表焦点小组的分析
J Investig Med. 1997 Aug;45(6):371-80.