Suppr超能文献

[咖啡因去肌纤蛋白张力试验:在恶性高热易感性诊断中的应用]

[Caffeine skinned fiber tension test: application to the diagnosis of susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia].

作者信息

Adnet P, Börtlein M L, Tavernier B, Nivoche Y, Etchrivi T, Krivosic-Horber R, Haudecoeur G

机构信息

Service d'accueil et d'urgences, hôpital Roger Salengro, CHU, Lille.

出版信息

Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1999 Jun;18(6):624-30. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(99)80148-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reactivity of sarcoplasmic reticulum to caffeine, using the skinned muscle fibre tension test and to compare it with the reference in vitro contracture test in the diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia (HM) susceptibility.

STUDY DESIGN

Laboratory investigation.

MATERIAL

Muscle biopsies from 63 patients, including 29 classified as susceptible to MH (MHS) and 34 classified as non-susceptible (MHN) according to criteria of the European and the North American MH groups.

METHOD

The reactivity to caffeine and halothane of skinned muscle fibres was compared, according to the type of fibres, with the data of the in vitro contracture test. The type of fibres (type I: oxidative, slow; type II: glycolytic, fast) were determined with strontium dose-response curves.

RESULTS

The reactivity to caffeine was significantly lower in the MHS group, for both type I and type II skinned fibres. However, in comparison with the data of the in vitro contracture tests, using the ROC curve analysis, the best sensitivity-specificity compromise was 90%-71% and 74%-84% for type I and type II skinned fibres respectively.

CONCLUSION

The skinned muscle fibre tension test cannot be used instead of the in vitro contracture test for the diagnostic of MHS. However, it may strengthen the data of the latter.

摘要

目的

采用去表皮肌纤维张力试验评估肌浆网对咖啡因的反应性,并将其与体外挛缩试验的参考值进行比较,以诊断恶性高热(MH)易感性。

研究设计

实验室研究。

材料

对63例患者进行肌肉活检,根据欧洲和北美MH组的标准,其中29例被分类为MH易感(MHS),34例被分类为非易感(MHN)。

方法

根据纤维类型,将去表皮肌纤维对咖啡因和氟烷的反应性与体外挛缩试验的数据进行比较。通过锶剂量-反应曲线确定纤维类型(I型:氧化型、慢肌纤维;II型:糖酵解型、快肌纤维)。

结果

对于I型和II型去表皮纤维,MHS组对咖啡因的反应性均显著降低。然而,与体外挛缩试验的数据相比,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,I型和II型去表皮纤维的最佳敏感性-特异性折衷分别为90%-71%和74%-84%。

结论

去表皮肌纤维张力试验不能替代体外挛缩试验用于MHS的诊断。然而,它可能会加强后者的数据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验