Wei S Y, Klimkiewicz J J, Lai M, Garino J P, Steinberg M E
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia 19104, USA.
Orthopedics. 1999 Aug;22(8):747-57. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19990801-06.
This retrospective study compared the results of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with avascular necrosis to patients with osteoarthritis. Twenty-two revision THAs (34 components) in 19 patients with avascular necrosis were compared with 35 revision THAs (55 components) in 31 patients with osteoarthritis. All of the procedures were performed by a single surgeon between 1981 and 1994, and all patients had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. At the time of revision surgery, the average age was 54 years for the avascular necrosis patients and 67 years for the osteoarthritis patients (P=.002). Clinical and radiographic follow-up was performed for an average of 7 years (range: 2-12 years). Six (18%) components in the avascular necrosis group and nine (16%) components in the osteoarthritis group required re-revision for aseptic loosening an average of 7 years after the original revision (range: 2-11 years). Statistical analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the two groups in regard to the incidence of failure, time to failure, Harris Hip Score, and radiographic appearance. Contrary to expectations derived from the literature on primary THA, no difference was found between the outcome and survivorship of revision THA in patients with avascular necrosis and patients with osteoarthritis, despite a significant difference in age.
这项回顾性研究比较了无血管性坏死患者与骨关节炎患者翻修全髋关节置换术(THA)的结果。将19例无血管性坏死患者的22例翻修THA(34个组件)与31例骨关节炎患者的35例翻修THA(55个组件)进行比较。所有手术均由同一外科医生在1981年至1994年期间完成,所有患者均至少随访2年。翻修手术时,无血管性坏死患者的平均年龄为54岁,骨关节炎患者为67岁(P = .002)。临床和影像学随访平均进行7年(范围:2至12年)。无血管性坏死组中有6个(18%)组件和骨关节炎组中有9个(16%)组件在初次翻修后平均7年(范围:2至11年)因无菌性松动需要再次翻修。统计分析表明,两组在失败发生率、失败时间、Harris髋关节评分和影像学表现方面无显著差异。与原发性THA文献中的预期相反,尽管年龄存在显著差异,但无血管性坏死患者和骨关节炎患者翻修THA的结果和生存率之间未发现差异。