Magerl Walter, Ali Zahid, Ellrich Jens, Meyer Richard A, Treede Rolf-Detlef
Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Johannes-Gutenberg-University, Saarstr. 21, D-55099 Mainz, Germany Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins-University, 600 N. Wolfe St., Meyer 5-109, Baltimore, MD 21287-7509, USA.
Pain. 1999 Aug;82(2):127-137. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00061-5.
Feedback-controlled laser heat was used to stimulate the hairy skin of the hand dorsum and forearm, and heat-evoked cerebral potentials were recorded at midline (Fz, Cz, Pz) and temporal (T3, T4) scalp positions. Based on data from primary afferent electrophysiology a stimulus level (40 degrees C) was chosen, which is above C-fiber heat threshold, but clearly below A delta-nociceptor heat threshold in order to excite selectively C-fibers without concomitant excitation of A delta-fibers. Feedback-controlled stepped heat stimuli to 40 degrees C elicited ultralate laser evoked potentials (LEPs) at the vertex in a high proportion of experiments (90%). Estimates of conduction velocity calculated from latency shifts between the hand and forearm sites of ultralate LEPs (2.4 m/s) and of reaction times (2.8 m/s) confirmed mediation of ultralate potentials by unmyelinated nerve fibers (nociceptors and/or warm fibers). The ultralate LEP could be differentiated from resolution of contingent negative variation (CNV), an endogenous potential related to expectation and response preparation, by its scalp topography. Strong heat stimuli of 48 degrees C, which is suprathreshold for most A delta- and C-fiber nociceptors, elicited the well-known late LEPs mediated by nociceptive Adelta-fibers confirming previous studies. The LEP waveform to strong heat stimuli also contained an ultralate component reminiscent of an ultralate LEP following the late LEP. Ultralate and late LEP had identical scalp topography. In conclusion, the method of temperature-controlled laser heat stimuli allows the selective and reliable examination of A delta- and C-fiber-mediated afferent pathways and the related cortical processing without the complication of dissociating A-fiber nerve blocks.
采用反馈控制的激光热刺激手背和前臂的有毛皮肤,并在头皮中线(Fz、Cz、Pz)和颞部(T3、T4)位置记录热诱发的脑电位。根据初级传入神经电生理数据选择刺激水平(40℃),该温度高于C纤维热阈值,但明显低于Aδ伤害感受器热阈值,以便选择性地激发C纤维而不伴随Aδ纤维的激发。在大多数实验(90%)中,反馈控制的阶梯式热刺激至40℃在头顶诱发了超晚期激光诱发电位(LEP)。根据超晚期LEP在手和前臂部位之间的潜伏期变化计算出的传导速度估计值(2.4m/s)和反应时间估计值(2.8m/s)证实了超晚期电位由无髓神经纤维(伤害感受器和/或温觉纤维)介导。超晚期LEP可通过其头皮地形图与伴随负变化(CNV)的消退相区分,CNV是一种与预期和反应准备相关的内源性电位。48℃的强热刺激对大多数Aδ和C纤维伤害感受器来说是阈上的,诱发了由伤害性Aδ纤维介导的众所周知的晚期LEP,证实了先前的研究。强热刺激的LEP波形还包含一个超晚期成分,类似于晚期LEP之后的超晚期LEP。超晚期和晚期LEP具有相同的头皮地形图。总之,温度控制的激光热刺激方法允许选择性和可靠地检查Aδ和C纤维介导的传入通路以及相关的皮层处理,而不会出现解离A纤维神经阻滞的并发症。