Valentini M, Mari E, Belfiglio M, Nicolucci A
Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Epidemiology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, S. Maria Imbaro, Italy.
Ann Oncol. 1999 Jul;10(7):789-93. doi: 10.1023/a:1008355014886.
Institutional and physician-related factors can influence the way in which physicians interpret research results. The aim of this study was to determine what physicians know about, and their opinions of, hormone treatment in breast cancer patients, and the factors comprising their medical decision-making.
A questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of physicians inquiring as to their preferences with respect to adjuvant tamoxifen, and the usual duration of the treatment applied in various clinical scenarios (according to a woman's menopausal status, the oestrogen receptor status and the stage of disease).
Of 500 physicians identified, 38% returned the questionnaire. Of the non-responders, a random sample of 60 physicians was interviewed by phone. The total number of available questionnaires was 250 (50%). About 3/4 of the doctors would prescribe tamoxifen in older ER+ women and 30%-40% in post-menopausal ER-patients, but only 2/5 would do so in younger ER+ women. The vast majority of physicians considered five years as standard for ER+ patients. Nevertheless, about 1/4 of the doctors chose a shorter treatment duration for node-negative, pre-menopausal patients. A minority of physicians used tamoxifen for longer than five years. Older clinicians were less likely to prescribe tamoxifen, particularly for low-risk patients.
According to the data of the recent EBCTG overview, an additional 20,000 lives could be saved worldwide each year if tamoxifen were given to all early breast cancer patients with hormone-sensitive disease, irrespective of age and disease stage, and for a minimum of five years. Our study, involving a representative sample of physicians practicing in Italy, shows that tamoxifen is not used optimally, with a substantial under-use in younger women and women with node-negative disease.
机构和医生相关因素会影响医生对研究结果的解读方式。本研究的目的是确定医生对乳腺癌患者激素治疗的了解程度、看法以及构成其医疗决策的因素。
向随机抽取的医生样本邮寄问卷,询问他们对辅助性他莫昔芬的偏好以及在各种临床情况下(根据女性的绝经状态、雌激素受体状态和疾病分期)通常的治疗持续时间。
在确定的500名医生中,38% 返回了问卷。对于未回复者,随机抽取60名医生进行电话访谈。可用问卷总数为250份(50%)。约四分之三的医生会给年龄较大的雌激素受体阳性女性开他莫昔芬,给绝经后雌激素受体阴性患者开药的比例为30% - 40%,但只有五分之二的医生会给年轻的雌激素受体阳性女性开药。绝大多数医生认为雌激素受体阳性患者的标准治疗时间为五年。然而,约四分之一的医生为淋巴结阴性的绝经前患者选择了较短的治疗时间。少数医生使用他莫昔芬的时间超过五年。年长的临床医生开他莫昔芬的可能性较小,尤其是对低风险患者。
根据近期早期乳腺癌协作组(EBCTG)综述的数据,如果给所有患有激素敏感性疾病的早期乳腺癌患者使用他莫昔芬,无论年龄和疾病分期如何,且至少使用五年,那么全球每年可多挽救20000条生命。我们的研究涉及意大利执业医生的代表性样本,结果显示他莫昔芬未得到最佳使用,在年轻女性和淋巴结阴性疾病患者中存在大量使用不足的情况。