• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童重度脑损伤:长期预后及其利用体感诱发电位(SEPs)进行的预测。

Severe brain injury in children: long-term outcome and its prediction using somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs).

作者信息

Carter B G, Taylor A, Butt W

机构信息

Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 1999 Jul;25(7):722-8. doi: 10.1007/s001340050936.

DOI:10.1007/s001340050936
PMID:10470577
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome of children 1 and 5 years after severe brain injury (Glasgow Coma Score < 8) using a functional measure [Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS)] and a health status measure (the Torrance Health State (HUI:1)) and to determine the ability of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to predict these long-term outcomes.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

A 16-bed paediatric intensive care unit in a tertiary children's hospital.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

105 children with severe brain injury.

INTERVENTIONS

SEPs were recorded once in the first week after admission. Outcome was assessed 1 and 5 years after injury using the GOS and at 5 years after injury using HUI:1.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

At 5 years, using the GOS, 46 (43.8%) children had a good outcome, 10 (9.5%) were moderately disabled, 2 (1.9%) severely disabled, 3 (2.9%) vegetative and 44 (41.9%) had died. At 5 years, 17 of 40 (42.5%) survivors from 1 year had changed outcomes: 12 had improved, 3 had worsened and 2 had died. For a normal SEP, positive predictive power was 85.4%, sensitivity 62.5%, specificity 87.8%, negative predictive power 67.2% and the positive likelihood ratio was 5.1. For bilaterally absent responses, positive predictive power was 90.9%, sensitivity 61.2%, specificity 94.6%; negative predictive power 73.6% and the positive likelihood ratio was 11.4. Outcomes using HUI:1 were: 30 (28.6%) had a good quality of life, 21 (20.0%) had a moderate quality of life, 7 (6.7%) a poor quality, 44 died (41.9%) and 3 (2.9%) survived in a state deemed worse than death. For a normal SEP, positive predictive power was 85.4%, sensitivity 68.6%, specificity 88.9%, negative predictive power 75.0% and the positive likelihood ratio was 6.2. For bilaterally absent responses, positive predictive power was 93.9%, sensitivity 57.4%, specificity 96.1%, negative predictive power 68.1% and the positive likelihood ratio was 14.6.

CONCLUSION

The outcome for children with severe brain injury should be assessed 5 years after injury because important changes occur between 1 year and 5 years. Differences exist between outcomes assessed using the GOS and HUI:1 as they measure slightly different aspects of function. Consideration should therefore be given to using both measures. SEPs are excellent predictors of long-term outcome measured by either the GOS or the HUI:1.

摘要

目的

采用功能评估指标[格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)]和健康状况评估指标(托伦斯健康状态量表(HUI:1)),评估重度脑损伤(格拉斯哥昏迷评分<8)患儿伤后1年和5年的预后情况,并确定体感诱发电位(SEP)预测这些长期预后的能力。

设计

前瞻性研究。

地点

一家三级儿童医院的16张床位的儿科重症监护病房。

患者及参与者

105例重度脑损伤患儿。

干预措施

入院后第一周内记录一次SEP。伤后1年和5年采用GOS评估预后,伤后5年采用HUI:1评估预后。

测量及结果

伤后5年,采用GOS评估,46例(43.8%)患儿预后良好,10例(9.5%)中度残疾,2例(1.9%)重度残疾,3例(2.9%)呈植物状态,44例(41.9%)死亡。伤后5年,1岁时存活的40例患儿中有17例(42.5%)预后发生变化:12例改善,3例恶化,2例死亡。对于正常SEP,阳性预测值为85.4%,敏感度为62.5%,特异度为87.8%,阴性预测值为67.2%,阳性似然比为5.1。对于双侧无反应,阳性预测值为90.9%,敏感度为61.2%,特异度为94.6%;阴性预测值为73.6%,阳性似然比为11.4。采用HUI:1评估的预后情况为:30例(28.6%)生活质量良好,21例(20.0%)生活质量中等,7例(6.7%)生活质量差,44例死亡(41.9%),3例(2.9%)存活但状态比死亡更差。对于正常SEP,阳性预测值为85.4%,敏感度为68.6%,特异度为8

相似文献

1
Severe brain injury in children: long-term outcome and its prediction using somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs).儿童重度脑损伤:长期预后及其利用体感诱发电位(SEPs)进行的预测。
Intensive Care Med. 1999 Jul;25(7):722-8. doi: 10.1007/s001340050936.
2
Somatosensory evoked potentials for prediction of outcome in acute severe brain injury.体感诱发电位用于预测急性重型脑损伤的预后
J Pediatr. 1995 Jan;126(1):44-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70498-1.
3
How reliable is the predictive value of SEP (somatosensory evoked potentials) patterns in severe brain damage with special regard to the bilateral loss of cortical responses?在严重脑损伤中,体感诱发电位(SEP)模式的预测价值有多可靠,尤其是在双侧皮质反应丧失方面?
Intensive Care Med. 1997 Mar;23(3):301-8. doi: 10.1007/s001340050332.
4
Use of somatosensory-evoked potentials and cognitive event-related potentials in predicting outcomes of patients with severe traumatic brain injury.体感诱发电位和认知事件相关电位在预测重型颅脑损伤患者预后中的应用。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jan;82(1):53-61; quiz 62-4, 80. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200301000-00009.
5
Review of the use of somatosensory evoked potentials in the prediction of outcome after severe brain injury.体感诱发电位在预测重度脑损伤后预后中的应用综述。
Crit Care Med. 2001 Jan;29(1):178-86. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200101000-00036.
6
Prediction of 'awakening' and outcome in prolonged acute coma from severe traumatic brain injury: evidence for validity of short latency SEPs.严重创伤性脑损伤所致长期急性昏迷中“苏醒”及预后的预测:短潜伏期体感诱发电位有效性的证据
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Jan;116(1):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.07.008.
7
Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review.体感诱发电位是重度脑损伤后预后的最佳预测指标吗?一项系统综述。
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jun;31(6):765-75. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2633-1. Epub 2005 Apr 22.
8
Somatosensory and motor evoked potentials at different stages of recovery from severe traumatic brain injury.重度创伤性脑损伤恢复不同阶段的体感诱发电位和运动诱发电位
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Jan;80(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90304-0.
9
Analysis of long-term (median 10.5 years) outcomes in children presenting with traumatic brain injury and an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 or 4.对初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为3或4分的创伤性脑损伤患儿的长期(中位时间10.5年)预后分析。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Oct;16(4):410-9. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.PEDS14679. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
10
Brainstem auditory evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials in prediction of posttraumatic coma in children.脑干听觉诱发电位和体感诱发电位在预测儿童创伤后昏迷中的应用
Pflugers Arch. 1996;431(6 Suppl 2):R289-90. doi: 10.1007/BF02346382.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurological Prognostication in Children After Cardiac Arrest.心脏骤停后儿童的神经预后。
Pediatr Neurol. 2020 Jul;108:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 Mar 15.
2
Prognosis in prolonged coma patients with diffuse axonal injury assessed by somatosensory evoked potentia.应用体感诱发电位评估弥漫性轴索损伤患者的迁延性昏迷预后。
Neural Regen Res. 2013 Apr 5;8(10):948-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.10.010.
3
Predicting outcome after childhood brain injury.预测儿童脑损伤后的预后。
CMAJ. 2012 Aug 7;184(11):1257-64. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.111045. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
4
Prognostic value of somatosensory evoked potentials in comatose children: a systematic literature review.昏迷儿童体感诱发电位的预后价值:系统文献回顾。
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jul;36(7):1112-26. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1884-7. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
5
ICP and CPP: excellent predictors of long term outcome in severely brain injured children.颅内压和脑灌注压:重度脑损伤儿童长期预后的良好预测指标。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2008 Feb;24(2):245-51. doi: 10.1007/s00381-007-0461-z. Epub 2007 Aug 22.
6
Acute necrotizing encephalopathy of childhood: correlation of MR findings and clinical outcome.儿童急性坏死性脑病:磁共振成像表现与临床结局的相关性
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Oct;27(9):1919-23.
7
A prospective study of outcome predictors after severe brain injury in children.一项关于儿童重型脑损伤后预后预测因素的前瞻性研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jun;31(6):840-5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2634-0. Epub 2005 Apr 28.
8
[Value of early somatosensory evoked potentials in intubated and mechanically ventilated patients with craniocerebral trauma].[早期体感诱发电位在颅脑外伤插管并机械通气患者中的价值]
Unfallchirurg. 2005 Feb;108(2):102-8. doi: 10.1007/s00113-004-0820-0.
9
Early decompressive craniectomy and duraplasty for refractory intracranial hypertension in children: results of a pilot study.儿童难治性颅内高压的早期减压性颅骨切除术及硬脑膜成形术:一项初步研究的结果
Crit Care. 2003 Dec;7(6):R133-8. doi: 10.1186/cc2361. Epub 2003 Sep 10.
10
Prognosis of brain stem lesion in children with head injury.儿童头部损伤脑干病变的预后
Childs Nerv Syst. 2003 Mar;19(3):174-8. doi: 10.1007/s00381-002-0703-z. Epub 2003 Feb 21.