• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮或外科气管切开术:一项荟萃分析。

Percutaneous or surgical tracheostomy: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Dulguerov P, Gysin C, Perneger T V, Chevrolet J C

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Geneva Hospital, Switzerland.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1999 Aug;27(8):1617-25. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00041.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-199908000-00041
PMID:10470774
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare percutaneous with surgical tracheostomy using a meta-analysis of studies published from 1960 to 1996.

DATA SOURCES

Publications obtained through a MEDLINE database search with a Boolean combination (tracheostomy or tracheotomy) and complications, with constraints for human studies and English language.

STUDY SELECTION

Publications addressing all peri- and postoperative complications. Studies limited to specific tracheostomy complications or containing insufficient details were excluded. Two authors independently selected the publications.

DATA EXTRACTION

A list of relevant surgical variables and complications was compiled. Complications were divided into peri- and postoperative groups and further subclassified into severe, intermediate, and minor groups. Because most studies of percutaneous tracheostomy were published after 1985, surgical tracheostomy studies were divided into two periods: 1960 to 1984 and 1985 to 1996. The articles were analyzed independently by three investigators, and rare discrepancies were resolved through discussion and data reexamination.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Earlier surgical tracheostomy studies (n = 17; patients, 4185) have the highest rates of both peri- (8.5%) and postoperative (33%) complications. Comparison of recent surgical (n = 21; patients, 3512) and percutaneous (n = 27; patients, 1817) tracheostomy trials shows that perioperative complications are more frequent with the percutaneous technique (10% vs. 3%), whereas postoperative complications occur more often with surgical tracheotomy (10% vs. 7%). The bulk of the differences is in minor complications, except perioperative death (0.44% vs. 0.03%) and serious cardiorespiratory events (0.33% vs. 0.06%), which were higher with the percutaneous technique. Heterogeneity analysis of complication rates shows higher heterogeneity in older and surgical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous tracheostomy is associated with a higher prevalence of perioperative complications and, especially, perioperative deaths and cardiorespiratory arrests. Postoperative complication rates are higher with surgical tracheostomy.

摘要

目的

通过对1960年至1996年发表的研究进行荟萃分析,比较经皮气管切开术和外科气管切开术。

数据来源

通过MEDLINE数据库检索获得的出版物,检索词为布尔组合(气管切开术或气管造口术)及并发症,检索限定为人体研究和英文文献。

研究选择

涉及所有围手术期和术后并发症的出版物。排除仅限于特定气管切开术并发症或细节不足的研究。由两位作者独立选择出版物。

数据提取

编制了一份相关手术变量和并发症的清单。并发症分为围手术期和术后组,并进一步细分为严重、中度和轻度组。由于大多数经皮气管切开术的研究发表于1985年之后,外科气管切开术的研究分为两个时期:1960年至1984年和1985年至1996年。由三名研究人员独立分析文章,罕见的差异通过讨论和数据重新审查解决。

数据综合

早期外科气管切开术的研究(n = 17;患者4185例)围手术期(8.5%)和术后(33%)并发症发生率最高。近期外科气管切开术(n = 21;患者3512例)和经皮气管切开术(n = 27;患者1817例)试验的比较表明,经皮技术围手术期并发症更常见(10%对3%),而外科气管切开术术后并发症更常见(10%对7%)。除围手术期死亡(0.44%对0.03%)和严重心肺事件(0.33%对0.06%)外,经皮技术的这些并发症发生率更高,差异主要在于轻度并发症。并发症发生率的异质性分析显示,在较旧的研究和外科手术试验中异质性更高。

结论

经皮气管切开术围手术期并发症的发生率较高,尤其是围手术期死亡和心肺骤停。外科气管切开术的术后并发症发生率更高。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous or surgical tracheostomy: a meta-analysis.经皮或外科气管切开术:一项荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 1999 Aug;27(8):1617-25. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00041.
2
[Percutaneous tracheostomy].经皮气管切开术
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2001 Mar;20(3):260-81. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(00)00342-7.
3
[Complications of tracheotomy (clinical contribution)].[气管切开术的并发症(临床研究)]
Acta Anaesthesiol. 1971 Sep-Oct;22(5):435-41.
4
Comparison of percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy versus open surgical technique in severe COVID-19: Complication rates, relative risks and benefits.比较经皮扩张气管切开术与开放式手术技术在重症 COVID-19 中的应用:并发症发生率、相对风险和获益。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2021 Jun;48(3):511-517. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.10.014. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
5
[Complications of tracheostomy in critically ill patients: comparison of dilation and surgical techniques].[重症患者气管切开术的并发症:扩张术与手术技术的比较]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2002 Aug;22(4 Suppl 71):1-11.
6
[Bilateral pneumothorax, cervicofacial and mediastinal emphysema after surgical tracheostomy].[手术气管切开术后双侧气胸、颈面部及纵隔气肿]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2013 Oct;32(10):718-20. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2013.07.815. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
7
Complications of tracheostomy.气管切开术的并发症
Am Surg. 1970 Jan;36(1):34-8.
8
[Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy or tracheostomy? Two case reports].[经皮扩张气管切开术还是气管造口术?两例病例报告]
HNO. 2015 Mar;63(3):220-3. doi: 10.1007/s00106-013-2783-3.
9
[Analysis on influencing factor of the complications of percutaneous dilational tracheotomy].经皮扩张气管切开术并发症的影响因素分析
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jan;50(1):57-60.
10
The role of fiberoptic bronchoscopy monitoring during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy and its routine use into tracheotomy practice.纤维支气管镜监测在经皮扩张气管切开术中的作用及其在气管切开实践中的常规应用。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2016 Jan;66(1):83-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: a bibliometric review and visual analysis (1990-2024).机械通气的重症监护病房患者经皮与外科气管切开术:文献计量学综述与可视化分析(1990 - 2024年)
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jul 31;17(7):5309-5319. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-306. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
2
Visual-Guided Transillumination Method for Accurate Percutaneous Tracheal Tube Placement.用于准确经皮气管插管置入的视觉引导透照法
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Mar 26;7(4):e1227. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001227. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.
3
Comparative Study of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy and Conventional Surgical Tracheostomy in Critically Ill Adult Patients.
成年危重症患者经皮扩张气管切开术与传统外科气管切开术的对比研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Sep;75(3):1568-1572. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03666-9. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
4
Naushad's Modification of Griggs Percutaneous Tracheostomy: Retrospective Case Series Study on 200 Patients at Subharti Medical College, Meerut, India.瑙沙德对格里格斯经皮气管切开术的改良:印度密拉特苏巴蒂医学院200例患者的回顾性病例系列研究
Maedica (Bucur). 2022 Mar;17(1):64-73. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2022.17.1.64.
5
Assessment of knowledge regarding tracheostomy care and management of early complications among healthcare professionals.评估医护专业人员对气管切开术护理和早期并发症管理的知识。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Mar-Apr;88(2):251-256. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
6
Experience of percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill COVID-19 patients.危重症COVID-19患者经皮气管切开术的经验
Acute Crit Care. 2020 Nov;35(4):263-270. doi: 10.4266/acc.2020.00444. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
7
Bedside Tracheostomy: Our Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital.床边气管切开术:我们在一家三级护理医院的经验。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):4841-4844. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01976-w. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
8
Multispecialty tracheostomy experience.多专科气管造口术经验。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020 May;102(5):343-347. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0184. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
9
Tracheostomy creation leading to innominate artery pseudoaneurysm: A case report.气管造口术导致无名动脉假性动脉瘤:一例报告。
Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Feb;64(2):159-161. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_654_19. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
10
Tracheostomy: Open Surgical or Percutaneous? An Effort to Solve the Continued Dilemma.气管切开术:开放手术还是经皮穿刺?解决持续困境的努力。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Sep;71(3):320-326. doi: 10.1007/s12070-019-01684-0. Epub 2019 Jun 19.