Uflacker R, Horn J, Phillips G, Selby J B
Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Sep;173(3):665-70. doi: 10.2214/ajr.173.3.10470899.
The objective of this study is to describe the use of intravascular sonography in the evaluation of suspected injury of the thoracic aorta as an adjunctive tool to digital subtraction arteriography (DSA).
Images of the thoracic aorta were obtained using DSA and intravascular sonography in 20 consecutive patients who underwent arteriography after chest trauma. A 6-French, 12.5-MHz sonography catheter was used for the intravascular sonography study. Diagnoses based on the review of both studies were compared.
Five of 20 patients had aortic or great vessel injuries confirmed by surgery. Intravascular sonographic findings were positive (one false-positive) in seven patients, whereas DSA findings were positive in six patients (one false-positive and one false-negative). Surgery showed the lesion that was false-positive using both techniques to be a ductus diverticulum. Intravascular sonographic findings included intimal flaps, intramural lesions (hematomas), pseudoaneurysms, and perivascular hematomas.
In our initial limited experience, intravascular sonography of the thoracic aorta and great vessels effectively identified traumatic injuries. Intramural injury without pseudoaneurysm formation or obvious intraluminal flap was visualized by intravascular sonography in one patient but was not detected by DSA. On the other hand, a ductus diverticulum was erroneously interpreted as trauma using both techniques. Intravascular sonography is a relatively new procedure with an obvious learning curve in the interpretation of the findings. An atypical ductus diverticulum may still be mistakenly interpreted as a sign of traumatic injury of the aorta. Familiarity with intravascular sonography in the setting of aortic trauma is necessary for correct interpretation of the images. The sonographic findings offer views of the aorta that are complementary to those of aortography.
本研究的目的是描述血管内超声在评估疑似胸主动脉损伤中的应用,作为数字减影血管造影(DSA)的辅助工具。
对20例胸部创伤后接受血管造影的连续患者,使用DSA和血管内超声获取胸主动脉图像。采用6F、12.5MHz的超声导管进行血管内超声检查。比较基于两项检查结果的诊断。
20例患者中有5例经手术证实存在主动脉或大血管损伤。血管内超声检查结果在7例患者中为阳性(1例假阳性),而DSA检查结果在6例患者中为阳性(1例假阳性和1例假阴性)。手术显示两种技术均为假阳性的病变为动脉导管憩室。血管内超声检查结果包括内膜瓣、壁内病变(血肿)、假性动脉瘤和血管周围血肿。
根据我们最初有限的经验,胸主动脉和大血管的血管内超声能有效识别创伤性损伤。1例患者通过血管内超声检查发现了无假性动脉瘤形成或明显腔内瓣的壁内损伤,但DSA未检测到。另一方面,两种技术均将动脉导管憩室错误地解释为创伤。血管内超声是一种相对较新的检查方法,在解读检查结果方面有明显的学习曲线。非典型动脉导管憩室仍可能被错误地解释为主动脉创伤的征象。熟悉主动脉创伤情况下的血管内超声检查对于正确解读图像很有必要。超声检查结果提供了与主动脉造影互补的主动脉视图。