Suppr超能文献

阿奇霉素治疗3天与头孢呋辛治疗10天对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者疗效的随机对照研究

[A randomized comparative study of 3 days of azithromycin treatment and 10 days of cefuroxime treatment in exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].

作者信息

Alvarez Gutiérrez F J, Soto Campos G, del Castillo Otero D, Sánchez Gómez J, Calderón Osuna E, Rodríguez Becerra E, Castillo Gómez J

机构信息

Unidad de EPOC e Infecciones Respiratorias, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla.

出版信息

Med Clin (Barc). 1999 Jul 3;113(4):124-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical and gasometric evolution and the side effects of two treatment schedules in the exacerbations of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): 500 mg/24 h of azithromycin (AZM) for three days versus 500 mg/12 h of acetyl cefuroxime (ACF) for 10 days.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized included into each therapeutic schedule. The patients were seen three times (days 1 and 4, and at 15-21 days) to evaluate clinical symptoms scores. Forced spirometry and arterial gasometry were performed the first and the last time the patients were seen. The number of patients requiring admission during follow up and the secondary effects of each antibiotic were quantified.

RESULTS

A total de 50 patients were treated with AZM and 51 with ACF. The evolution of the symptoms was similar although with a trend to greater improvement in those treated with AZM. This improvement was significant for the characteristics of expectoration (p < 0.05). Functional and gasometric evolution was similar in the two schedules. Three patients treated with AZM required hospital admission, as did 5 treated with ACF. A greater number of secondary effects were observed in patients treated with ACF (18%) than in those receiving AZM (10%), with gastrointestinal side effects being the most commonly observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with short schedule of AZM may have the same activity as longer schedule of ACF, with fewer secondary effects thereby suggesting that AZM may be an effective alternative in the treatment of exacerbations in patients with COPD.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在前瞻性评估两种治疗方案对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)加重期患者的临床、气体测量指标变化及副作用:三天内每日24小时服用500毫克阿奇霉素(AZM),与十天内每日12小时服用500毫克头孢呋辛酯(ACF)。

患者与方法

患者被随机纳入各治疗方案。对患者进行三次访视(第1天和第4天,以及第15 - 21天)以评估临床症状评分。在患者首次和末次访视时进行肺功能测定和动脉血气分析。对随访期间需要住院的患者数量以及每种抗生素的副作用进行量化。

结果

共有50例患者接受AZM治疗,51例接受ACF治疗。症状演变相似,尽管接受AZM治疗的患者有更大改善的趋势。在咳痰特征方面,这种改善具有显著性(p < 0.05)。两种治疗方案的功能和气体测量指标变化相似。接受AZM治疗的3例患者需要住院,接受ACF治疗的有5例。观察到接受ACF治疗的患者(18%)比接受AZM治疗的患者(10%)有更多的副作用,其中胃肠道副作用最为常见。

结论

短期使用AZM治疗可能与长期使用ACF具有相同的疗效,且副作用更少,这表明AZM可能是治疗COPD加重期患者的一种有效替代药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验