Kaveny M C
Notre Dame Law School, IN 46556, USA.
J Med Philos. 1999 Jun;24(3):207-23. doi: 10.1076/jmep.24.3.207.2528.
This essay serves as an introduction to this issue of the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy on commodification and health care. The essay attempts to sharpen the articulation of generally expressed worries about the commodification of health care. It does so by defining commodification, analyzing three components of the good of health care, and attempting to assess how commodification might distort the shape of each of those components. Next, it explores how the good of health care might be distorted by the market-based principle of distributive justice, "to each according to ability to pay." Finally, it identifies two basic questions about the relationship of medicine and the market that merit further exploration. (1) How does the market-based language of "incentives" so pervasive in the world of managed care distort the complex patterns of virtue and vice that motivate actors in the health care arena? (2) If we recognize that we cannot eliminate the influence of money from the health care system, how can we insure that the good of health care remains, in Radin's terms, "incompletely commodified"?
本文是《医学与哲学杂志》本期关于医疗保健商品化问题的引言。本文试图更清晰地阐述人们对医疗保健商品化普遍表达的担忧。文章通过定义商品化、分析医疗保健益处的三个组成部分,并试图评估商品化如何可能扭曲这些组成部分的形态来做到这一点。接下来,探讨基于市场的分配正义原则“按支付能力分配给每个人”如何可能扭曲医疗保健的益处。最后,确定了关于医学与市场关系的两个基本问题,值得进一步探讨。(1)在管理式医疗领域普遍存在的基于市场的“激励”语言如何扭曲激励医疗保健领域行为者的善恶复杂模式?(2)如果我们认识到无法消除金钱对医疗保健系统的影响,我们如何确保用雷丁的话说,医疗保健的益处仍然“未完全商品化”?