Kapur R, Sinha P K, Nanda R S
Univesity of Oklahoma, College of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Oklahoma City, USA.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Sep;116(3):271-4. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70237-4.
This study measures and compares the level of frictional resistance generated between titanium and stainless steel brackets. Both 0.018 and 0.022 inch slot size edgewise brackets were tested with different sized rectangular stainless steel wires in a specially designed apparatus. The frictional resistance was measured on Instron Universal testing machine (Instron Corp, Canton, Mass) with a 10 pound load cell. The specimen population was composed of 180 brackets and 180 wire specimens. A completely randomized design (one way) ANOVA was used to test for significant differences among the three bracket/wire types in the 0.018 and 0.022 inch slot sizes. This was followed by the Student Newman Keuls Multiple Comparison of means ranking at P < .05 to determine differences between the different groups. The titanium brackets showed lower static and kinetic frictional force as the wire size increased, whereas stainless steel brackets showed higher static and kinetic frictional force as the wire size increased.
本研究测量并比较了钛合金托槽和不锈钢托槽之间产生的摩擦阻力水平。在一个专门设计的仪器中,对0.018英寸和0.022英寸槽沟尺寸的方丝弓托槽与不同尺寸的矩形不锈钢丝进行了测试。在英斯特朗万能材料试验机(英斯特朗公司,马萨诸塞州坎顿)上使用10磅测力传感器测量摩擦阻力。样本群体由180个托槽和180个钢丝样本组成。采用完全随机设计(单因素)方差分析来检验0.018英寸和0.022英寸槽沟尺寸下三种托槽/钢丝类型之间的显著差异。随后进行学生-纽曼-基尔斯多重比较均值排序,显著性水平为P < .05,以确定不同组之间的差异。随着钢丝尺寸的增加,钛合金托槽的静摩擦力和动摩擦力较低,而不锈钢托槽的静摩擦力和动摩擦力则较高。