• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工唾液中带涂层弓丝的二氧化硅植入陶瓷托槽的静摩擦力和动摩擦力

Static and kinetic frictional forces of silica-insert ceramic brackets with coated archwires in artificial saliva.

作者信息

Shahabi Mostafa, Salari Soheil, Poosti Maryam, Abtahi Mostafa

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Department of Orthodontics, Aja University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2017 Nov-Dec;14(6):412-417. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.218567.

DOI:10.4103/1735-3327.218567
PMID:29238380
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5713065/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During sliding mechanics, the frictional force (FF) is an important counterforce to orthodontic tooth movement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the static and kinetic FFs of S silica-insert ceramic (SIC) brackets with Teflon-coated (TC) and conventional S stainless steel (SS) archwires.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The target group of this study included 80 maxillary canine 0.022 inch slot SIC brackets. Forty SS brackets were used as the control. TC and conventional uncoated SS archwires of different dimensions (0.016, 0.018, 0.016 × 0.022, and 0.018 × 0.025 inch) were examined. All tests were carried out under artificial saliva injected condition. Scanning Electron Micrographs were prepared for two samples of coated and uncoated archwires. Analysis of variance and Tukey tests were used for statistical purposes (level of significance < 0.05).

RESULTS

SIC brackets showed significantly lower levels of FFs than SS brackets. TC archwires had greater frictional values than conventional uncoated ones. They also exhibited an unusual behavior of increasing kinetic FFs with time. Indentation and delamination of coating were obvious under scanning electron microscopy observations.

CONCLUSION

From the standpoint of friction, SIC brackets may serve well, even better than SS brackets, in sliding mechanics. The coating layer of the archwires may delaminate and lost, causing an impediment to tooth movement.

摘要

背景

在滑动矫治力学中,摩擦力是正畸牙齿移动的重要反作用力。本研究的目的是研究带有聚四氟乙烯涂层(TC)的S型含硅陶瓷(SIC)托槽与传统S型不锈钢(SS)弓丝之间的静摩擦力和动摩擦力。

材料与方法

本研究的目标组包括80个上颌尖牙0.022英寸槽沟的SIC托槽。40个SS托槽用作对照。检测了不同尺寸(0.016、0.018、0.016×0.022和0.018×0.025英寸)的TC和传统未涂层SS弓丝。所有测试均在注入人工唾液的条件下进行。对涂层和未涂层弓丝的两个样本制备扫描电子显微镜图像。方差分析和Tukey检验用于统计学分析(显著性水平<0.05)。

结果

SIC托槽显示出的摩擦力水平显著低于SS托槽。TC弓丝的摩擦值高于传统未涂层弓丝。它们还表现出动摩擦力随时间增加的异常行为。在扫描电子显微镜观察下,涂层的压痕和分层明显。

结论

从摩擦的角度来看,SIC托槽在滑动矫治力学中可能表现良好,甚至比SS托槽更好。弓丝的涂层可能会分层并脱落,从而阻碍牙齿移动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c9d/5713065/f91e38788a09/DRJ-14-412-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c9d/5713065/d958e5ab2c8b/DRJ-14-412-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c9d/5713065/f91e38788a09/DRJ-14-412-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c9d/5713065/d958e5ab2c8b/DRJ-14-412-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c9d/5713065/f91e38788a09/DRJ-14-412-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Static and kinetic frictional forces of silica-insert ceramic brackets with coated archwires in artificial saliva.人工唾液中带涂层弓丝的二氧化硅植入陶瓷托槽的静摩擦力和动摩擦力
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2017 Nov-Dec;14(6):412-417. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.218567.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance Between Different Types of Ceramic Brackets and Stainless Steel Brackets With Teflon-Coated Stainless Steel and Stainless Steel Archwires: An In-Vitro Study.不同类型陶瓷托槽与不锈钢托槽搭配聚四氟乙烯涂层不锈钢丝和不锈钢弓丝之间摩擦阻力的比较评估:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2022 Apr 15;14(4):e24161. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24161. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
A comparative study of frictional resistance during simulated canine retraction on typodont model.在牙列模型上模拟犬牙后移过程中摩擦阻力的对比研究。
J Orthod Sci. 2013 Apr;2(2):61-6. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.115091.
4
An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.不同尺寸弓丝与传统不锈钢及自锁不锈钢托槽在多种托槽-弓丝组合方式下摩擦特性的体外评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Aug 1;18(8):660-664. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2102.
5
In vitro evaluation of frictional forces of two ceramic orthodontic brackets versus a stainless steel bracket in combination with two types of archwires.两种陶瓷正畸托槽与一种不锈钢托槽在搭配两种弓丝时的摩擦力的体外评估。
J Orthod Sci. 2015 Apr-Jun;4(2):42-6. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.156028.
6
Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.使用涂有特氟龙的结扎丝与各种托槽 - 弓丝组合时的摩擦力。
Angle Orthod. 1995;65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0063:FRUTLW>2.0.CO;2.
7
Frictional forces between lingual brackets and archwires measured by a friction tester.通过摩擦测试仪测量舌侧托槽与弓丝之间的摩擦力。
Angle Orthod. 2004 Dec;74(6):816-24. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0816:FFBLBA>2.0.CO;2.
8
Efficacy of Super Slick elastomeric modules in reducing friction during sliding: a comparative in vitro study.超顺滑弹性模块在减少滑动过程中摩擦力方面的功效:一项体外比较研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Sep 1;15(5):543-51. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1576.
9
Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.评估传统及金属植入陶瓷托槽在各种托槽-弓丝组合中的摩擦力。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Oct;124(4):403-9. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00501-8.
10
In vitro sliding-driven morphological changes in representative esthetic NiTi archwire surfaces.代表性美观镍钛弓丝表面的体外滑动驱动形态变化。
Microsc Res Tech. 2015 Oct;78(10):926-34. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22557. Epub 2015 Aug 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Friction in orthodontics.正畸学中的摩擦力
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Aug;7(Suppl 2):S334-8. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.163439.
2
Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva--an in vitro evaluation.不同牙弓丝托槽组合在人工唾液中的摩擦性能——体外评价。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Jan-Feb;19(1):57-62. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572011000100012.
3
Static frictional force and surface roughness of various bracket and wire combinations.各种托槽和弓丝组合的静摩擦力和表面粗糙度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Jan;139(1):74-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.02.031.
4
Friction and resistance to sliding in orthodontics: a critical review.正畸学中的摩擦力与滑动阻力:一项批判性综述
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Apr;135(4):442-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.023.
5
Ex vivo surface and mechanical properties of coated orthodontic archwires.正畸弓丝涂层的体外表面及力学性能
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Dec;30(6):661-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn057. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
6
A comparison of different ligation methods on friction.不同结扎方法对摩擦力影响的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Nov;130(5):666-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.021.
7
Friction of conventional and silica-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-wire combinations.传统及含二氧化硅陶瓷托槽在不同托槽-弓丝组合中的摩擦力
Angle Orthod. 2007 Jan;77(1):100-7. doi: 10.2319/092705-333R.1.
8
Factors affecting friction in the pre-adjusted appliance.预调矫治器中影响摩擦力的因素。
Eur J Orthod. 2004 Dec;26(6):579-83. doi: 10.1093/ejo/26.6.579.
9
Corrosion and permanent fracture resistance of coated and conventional orthodontic wires.涂层正畸丝与传统正畸丝的耐腐蚀性和抗永久断裂性
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2002 Feb;13(2):141-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1013831011241.
10
Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts.使用标准化弓丝和牙模型评估传统托槽和自锁托槽设计的摩擦阻力。
Angle Orthod. 2004 Apr;74(2):202-11. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0202:EOTFRO>2.0.CO;2.