Suppr超能文献

巩固化疗后急性髓系白血病的门诊管理。血液学急诊单元的作用。

Out-patient management of acute myeloid leukemia after consolidation chemotherapy. Role of a hematologic emergency unit.

作者信息

Girmenia C, Alimena G, Latagliata R, Morano S G, Celesti F, Coppola L, Spadea A, Tosti S, Mecarocci S, D'Elia G M, Tafuri A, Cimino G, Mandelli F

机构信息

Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Cellulari ed Ematologia, University "La Sapienza", Via Benevento 6, 00161, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Haematologica. 1999 Sep;84(9):814-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Increasing attention to quality of life and to health care costs has recently induced several cancer centers to change in-patient management into an out-patient setting even during high risk phases of disease. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate feasibility and safety, as well as clinical characteristics, of out-hospital management of AML patients during their post-consolidation phase.

DESIGN AND METHODS

All patients who were treated over a three year period by the three following protocols were included in the study: AML10 EORTC/GIMEMA for patients with AML, except for APL, aged </= 60 years; AML 13 EORTC/GIMEMA, for patients with AML, except for APL, aged >60 years; AIDA GIMEMA for APL patients. All patients submitted to the AML10 and AML13 protocols and those patients submitted to the AIDA protocol with difficult peripheral vein access had a central venous catheter (CVC) sited. Patients treated as in-patients were discharged at the end of consolidation chemotherapy provided they were in a good clinical condition. They were routinely evaluated on an out-patient basis twice weekly. In the event of any complication they were referred to the Emergency Unit of our Department dedicated to out-patients with hematologic diseases.

RESULTS

One hundred and eleven patients with AML were eligible for intensive chemotherapy. After achievement of complete remission they received a total of 133 consolidation courses and in 127 instances they were followed on an out-patient basis during the aplastic phase. There were 69 cases (54%) of rehospitalization, 68 because of fever and only one because of severe anemia. Rehospitalization occurred in 90%,70% and 38% of courses in AML10, AML13 and AIDA protocols, respectively. Only one patient died: the cause of death was a brain hemorrhage. Coagulase negative staphylococci and viridans streptococci were the organisms most frequently isolated from blood. Most coagulase negative staphylococci were isolated in patients submitted to AML10 and AML13 protocols, who had an indwelling CVC. Empiric once-a-day antibacterial therapy with ceftriaxone and amikacin was effective in 75% of the cases and made early discharge possible in 28% of the cases with antibiotic therapy continued in an out-patient setting. Overall, patients were managed out of the hospital for 66% of the period of post-consolidation neutropenia (77%, 48% and 50% of the post-consolidation neutropenia period in patients treated with AIDA, AML10 and AML13 protocols, respectively).

INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS

Thanks to the availability of an emergency unit specifically dedicated to out-patients with hematologic diseases, selected out-hospital management of AML patients during post-consolidation cytopenia is a feasible, well accepted and cost-saving option, and can contribute to lower the risk of developing severe nosocomial infections. The empiric therapy with once-a-day ceftriaxone plus amikacin was effective, with the exception of staphylococcal infections, and made it possible to discharge patients early to continue treatment in an out-patient setting.

摘要

背景与目的

近年来,对生活质量和医疗保健成本的关注度不断提高,促使一些癌症中心即使在疾病的高风险阶段,也将住院治疗改为门诊治疗。这项前瞻性研究的目的是评估急性髓系白血病(AML)患者巩固治疗后阶段门诊管理的可行性、安全性以及临床特征。

设计与方法

本研究纳入了在三年期间接受以下三种方案治疗的所有患者:AML10 EORTC/GIMEMA方案,用于年龄≤60岁的非急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)的AML患者;AML 13 EORTC/GIMEMA方案,用于年龄>60岁的非APL的AML患者;AIDA GIMEMA方案,用于APL患者。所有接受AML10和AML13方案治疗的患者以及那些接受AIDA方案治疗且外周静脉穿刺困难的患者均留置了中心静脉导管(CVC)。接受住院治疗的患者在巩固化疗结束时,若临床状况良好则予以出院。他们按常规每周门诊评估两次。若出现任何并发症,将被转诊至我院专门针对血液系统疾病门诊患者的急诊科。

结果

111例AML患者符合强化化疗条件。完全缓解后,他们共接受了133个巩固疗程,其中127例在再生障碍期接受门诊随访。有69例(54%)再次住院,68例是因为发热,仅1例是因为严重贫血。AML10、AML13和AIDA方案的疗程中再次住院率分别为90%、70%和38%。仅1例患者死亡,死亡原因是脑出血。凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌和草绿色链球菌是最常从血液中分离出的微生物。大多数凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌是在接受AML10和AML13方案治疗且留置CVC的患者中分离出的。经验性每日一次使用头孢曲松和阿米卡星的抗菌治疗在75%的病例中有效,使28%的病例能够提前出院,并在门诊继续抗生素治疗。总体而言,患者在巩固治疗后中性粒细胞减少期的66%时间内接受门诊管理(接受AIDA、AML10和AML13方案治疗的患者在巩固治疗后中性粒细胞减少期的这一比例分别为77%、48%和50%)。

解读与结论

由于有专门针对血液系统疾病门诊患者的急诊科,AML患者在巩固治疗后血细胞减少期进行选择性门诊管理是一种可行、易于接受且节省成本的选择,并且有助于降低发生严重医院感染的风险。除葡萄球菌感染外,每日一次使用头孢曲松加阿米卡星的经验性治疗有效,并使患者能够尽早出院,在门诊继续治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验