Gottlieb R H, Widjaja J, Tian L, Rubens D J, Voci S L
Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 648, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
J Clin Ultrasound. 1999 Oct;27(8):415-20. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(199910)27:8<415::aid-jcu1>3.0.co;2-6.
We determined the accuracy of sonography in the detection of isolated calf deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and the rate of indeterminate ultrasound examinations in patients with physical signs or symptoms suggestive of DVT.
We reviewed the medical literature (MEDLINE) to determine the accuracy of sonography and the frequency of indeterminate studies in detecting isolated calf DVT in patients with physical signs or symptoms suggestive of DVT. A meta-analysis was used to derive summary measures of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy from studies in which 5 or more isolated calf DVT were identified. Frequencies of indeterminate examinations were recorded for studies in which these data were provided, and we pooled these results with our own data for 196 patients.
The meta-analysis revealed that sonography correctly identified isolated calf DVT in 49 of 53 extremities (sensitivity, 92.5%; 95% confidence interval, 81.8-97.9%) and correctly identified the absence of calf DVT in 157 of 159 extremities (specificity, 98.7%; 95% confidence interval, 95.5-99. 9%), yielding an accuracy of 97.2% (95% confidence interval, 93.9-99. 0%) for ultrasound examinations considered diagnostic. However, when evaluating our patient population and the literature, we found a substantial number of indeterminate studies (overall rate of 54.6% in 463 extremities), with a wide variation in the reported frequency of indeterminate studies (9.3-82.7%).
Sonography is highly accurate in detecting isolated calf DVT in symptomatic patients, but indeterminate studies occur frequently, with a wide range of reported rates. Each ultrasound laboratory should evaluate its own rate of indeterminate studies.
我们确定了超声检查在检测孤立性小腿深静脉血栓形成(DVT)中的准确性,以及在有DVT体征或症状的患者中超声检查结果不确定的发生率。
我们检索了医学文献(MEDLINE),以确定超声检查在检测有DVT体征或症状的患者中孤立性小腿DVT的准确性以及结果不确定的研究频率。对于确定了5例或更多孤立性小腿DVT的研究,采用荟萃分析得出敏感性、特异性和准确性的汇总指标。记录了提供这些数据的研究中结果不确定的检查频率,并将这些结果与我们自己的196例患者的数据合并。
荟萃分析显示,超声检查在53个肢体中的49个正确识别出孤立性小腿DVT(敏感性92.5%;95%置信区间81.8-97.9%),在159个肢体中的157个正确识别出无小腿DVT(特异性98.7%;95%置信区间95.5-99.9%),对于诊断性超声检查,其准确性为97.2%(95%置信区间93.9-99.0%)。然而,在评估我们的患者群体和文献时,我们发现大量结果不确定的研究(463个肢体中总体发生率为54.6%),报告的结果不确定研究频率差异很大(9.3-82.7%)。
超声检查在检测有症状患者的孤立性小腿DVT方面高度准确,但结果不确定的研究频繁发生,报告的发生率范围很广。每个超声实验室都应评估自己结果不确定的研究发生率。