Craig J, Baron-Cohen S
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1999 Aug;29(4):319-26. doi: 10.1023/a:1022163403479.
Three studies are reported that address the often described impoverished creativity in autism. Using the Torrance Creativity Tests, Experiment 1 found that children with autism and Asperger syndrome (AS) showed impairments. Experiment 2 tested two explanations of these results: the executive dysfunction and the imagination deficit hypotheses. Results supported both hypotheses. Children with autism and AS could generate possible novel changes to an object, though they generated fewer of these relative to controls. Furthermore, these were all reality-based, rather than imaginative. Experiment 3 extended this using a test of imaginative fluency. Children with autism and AS generated fewer suggestions involving attribution of animacy to foam shapes, compared to controls, instead generating reality-based suggestions of what the shapes could be. Although this is evidence of executive dysfunction, it does not directly account for why imaginative creativity is more difficult than reality-based creativity.
本文报告了三项针对自闭症患者中常被提及的创造力匮乏问题的研究。实验1使用托兰斯创造力测试,发现自闭症儿童和阿斯伯格综合征(AS)儿童存在创造力受损情况。实验2对这些结果的两种解释进行了测试:执行功能障碍和想象力缺陷假说。结果支持了这两种假说。自闭症儿童和AS儿童能够对一个物体提出可能的新颖变化,不过相对于对照组,他们提出的这类变化较少。此外,这些变化都是基于现实的,而非富有想象力的。实验3通过一项想象力流畅性测试对此进行了拓展。与对照组相比,自闭症儿童和AS儿童提出的将生命赋予泡沫形状的建议较少,而是提出了基于现实的关于这些形状可能是什么的建议。虽然这证明了执行功能障碍,但它并未直接解释为什么富有想象力的创造力比基于现实的创造力更困难。