Lucertini G, Viacava A, Finocchi C, Grana A, Belardi P
Cattedra di Chirurgia Vascolare, Università degli Studi, Genova.
Minerva Cardioangiol. 1999 May;47(5):157-65.
Some trials have demonstrated effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for preventing stroke in patients with severe symptomatic carotid stenosis. Although some researches, indication to surgery for asymptomatic carotid stenosis is debated up today. Based on personal experience and literature, the main problems of CEA for asymptomatic stenosis are discussed.
Retrospective study.
Section of Vascular Surgery, University Department.
CEA was performed in a consecutive series of 63 cases with asymptomatic stenosis (59 patients, 40 males and 19 females, ages ranging from 46 to 80 years, mean 67.9).
CEA was performed under general anesthesia, with primary closure of arteriotomy in 37 cases and patch angioplasty using PTFE in 24, using eversion technique in 2 cases. Pruitt-Inahara shunt was used in 10/63 cases (15.9%), according to the mean velocity of the middle cerebral artery at carotid clamping/mean velocity of the middle cerebral artery pre-clamping ratio x 100 equal to or lesser than 15%, evaluated with transcranial Doppler, or stump pressure lesser than 50 mmHg, when transcranial Doppler examination was not possible.
Operative mortality and postoperative morbidity.
Operative mortality plus postoperative stroke were 1.6% (1/63). Operative mortality was precisely 0.0%. Postoperative complications were two: one was a neurologic deficit (monoparesis of the arm) and the other was myocardial ischemia.
Four main problems have been shown in CEA for asymptomatic stenosis: 1. Identification of asymptomatic stenosis: 2. Assessment of risk for stroke: 3. Role of CEA: 4. Questions about surgical treatment. For the first problem, it is important to consider possible indicators for carotid stenosis (contralateral carotid stenosis, coronary artery disease, aortic aneurysm, peripheral arterial disease, etc.). With regard to the second problem, it is important to know the natural history of the carotid stenosis, which shows a stroke rate of 1-2% per year. Regarding the third problem, the role of CEA is conditioned by: trials, patient conditions, lesion characteristics and ability of the surgeon. Further studies should identify some groups of patients (with severe carotid stenosis, dyshomogeneous plaque, progression of plaque, etc.), who can profit from CEA. Finally (fourth problem), CEA for asymptomatic carotid stenosis carries all common problems of carotid surgery (preoperative assessment, evaluation of cerebral ischemia due to carotid clamping, shunt, closure of arteriotomy, etc.). Some of these problems can receive ultimate solutions from some studies in next years.
一些试验已证明颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)在预防重度症状性颈动脉狭窄患者中风方面的有效性。尽管有一些研究,但无症状性颈动脉狭窄的手术指征至今仍存在争议。基于个人经验和文献,讨论了CEA治疗无症状性狭窄的主要问题。
回顾性研究。
大学附属医院血管外科。
对连续63例无症状性狭窄患者进行了CEA手术(59例患者,40例男性和19例女性,年龄46至80岁,平均67.9岁)。
在全身麻醉下进行CEA手术,37例动脉切开术一期缝合,24例使用聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)补片血管成形术,2例采用外翻技术。根据经颅多普勒评估的颈动脉夹闭时大脑中动脉平均流速/夹闭前大脑中动脉平均流速×100小于或等于15%,或在无法进行经颅多普勒检查时残端压力小于50 mmHg,63例中有10例(15.9%)使用了普鲁伊特-伊纳哈拉分流管。
手术死亡率和术后发病率。
手术死亡率加术后中风发生率为1.6%(1/63)。手术死亡率确切为0.0%。术后并发症有两例:一例为神经功能缺损(手臂单瘫),另一例为心肌缺血。
CEA治疗无症状性狭窄存在四个主要问题:1. 无症状性狭窄的识别;2. 中风风险评估;3. CEA的作用;4. 手术治疗相关问题。对于第一个问题,重要的是考虑颈动脉狭窄的可能指标(对侧颈动脉狭窄、冠状动脉疾病、主动脉瘤、外周动脉疾病等)。关于第二个问题,了解颈动脉狭窄的自然病程很重要,其自然病程显示每年中风发生率为1 - 2%。关于第三个问题,CEA的作用受以下因素制约:试验、患者情况、病变特征和外科医生的能力。进一步的研究应确定一些能从CEA中获益的患者群体(如重度颈动脉狭窄、斑块不均质、斑块进展等)。最后(第四个问题),无症状性颈动脉狭窄的CEA存在颈动脉手术的所有常见问题(术前评估、颈动脉夹闭导致的脑缺血评估、分流、动脉切开术闭合等)。其中一些问题可能会在未来几年的一些研究中得到最终解决。