van der Vleuten C J, van Vlijmen-Willems I M, de Jong E M, van de Kerkhof P C
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Arch Dermatol Res. 1999 Jul-Aug;291(7-8):390-5. doi: 10.1007/s004030050427.
It is well established that the efficacy of corticosteroids under occlusion with hydrocolloids (HCD) is superior compared to monotherapy with topical corticosteroids. However, following treatment with more potent corticosteroids, increased side effects and a more pronounced rebound might be expected. In the present clinical study, the efficacy of relapse after and the safety characteristics of two treatment modalities were compared: clobetasol-17-propionate lotion under an HCD dressing once weekly versus clobetasol-17-propionate ointment without an HCD twice daily. Clinical assessments were recorded and skin biopsies were taken before therapy, at clearance and 6 weeks after clearance. A panel of monoclonal antibodies to characterize epidermal proliferation, differentiation and inflammation were selected. In addition, clinical and histological assessments for skin atrophy were made. Both therapies had a major therapeutic effect, which was reflected in the clinical and immunohistochemical parameters. The only difference between the two therapies was a faster remission induction time in patients treated with corticosteroids combined with HCD. Six weeks after discontinuation of treatment, similar clinical and histological signs of relapse were observed for both therapies. Clinically, there were no signs of skin atrophy but histologically, epidermal thinning occurred to the same extent with both therapies but proved to be reversible within 6 weeks of discontinuation of treatment. From this study it can be concluded that the combination of HCD and corticosteroids is able to induce relatively fast remission compared to corticosteroid monotherapy but relapse and safety characteristics are comparable to the unoccluded corticosteroid therapy.
众所周知,皮质类固醇在水胶体封闭(HCD)下的疗效优于局部皮质类固醇单一疗法。然而,使用更强效的皮质类固醇治疗后,可能会出现更多的副作用和更明显的反跳现象。在本临床研究中,比较了两种治疗方式治疗后的复发疗效和安全性特征:每周一次在HCD敷料下使用丙酸氯倍他索洗剂与每日两次不使用HCD的丙酸氯倍他索软膏。记录临床评估结果,并在治疗前、清除期和清除后6周进行皮肤活检。选择一组单克隆抗体来表征表皮增殖、分化和炎症。此外,还对皮肤萎缩进行了临床和组织学评估。两种疗法均有主要治疗效果,这在临床和免疫组化参数中得到体现。两种疗法之间的唯一差异是,接受皮质类固醇联合HCD治疗的患者缓解诱导时间更快。治疗中断6周后,两种疗法观察到相似的临床和组织学复发迹象。临床上,没有皮肤萎缩的迹象,但在组织学上,两种疗法的表皮变薄程度相同,但在治疗中断6周内被证明是可逆的。从这项研究可以得出结论,与皮质类固醇单一疗法相比,HCD与皮质类固醇联合使用能够诱导相对较快的缓解,但复发和安全性特征与未封闭的皮质类固醇疗法相当。