• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开放性腹疝修补术的比较

Comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral herniorrhaphy.

作者信息

Ramshaw B J, Esartia P, Schwab J, Mason E M, Wilson R A, Duncan T D, Miller J, Lucas G W, Promes J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Georgia Baptist Medical Center, Atlanta, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 1999 Sep;65(9):827-31; discussion 831-2.

PMID:10484084
Abstract

The repair of large and/or recurrent ventral hernias is associated with significant complications and a recurrence rate that can be more than 50 per cent. Laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy, a recent development, has been shown to be safe and effective in the repair of ventral hernias. This study retrospectively reviews all ventral hernia repairs over a 3-year period, November 1995 through December 1998, at a community-based teaching hospital. The purpose of the study was to compare open and laparoscopic repairs. A total of 253 ventral hernia repairs were performed during this time, 174 open and 79 laparoscopic. The age, weight, and sex distribution was similar for each group. The hernias in the open group averaged 34.1 cm2 in size, and mesh used averaged 47.3 cm2. In the laparoscopic group, the hernia defect averaged 73.0 cm2, and the mesh size averaged 287.4 cm2. Operative time was longer in the open group, 82.0 versus 58.0 minutes. In the open group, there were 38 (21.8%) minor and 8 (4.6%) major complications, compared with 13 (16.5%) minor and 2 (2.5%) major complications in the laparoscopic group. Hospital stay was shorter for the laparoscopic group, 1.7 versus 2.8 days. At an average follow-up of 21 months (range, 2-40 months), there have been 36 recurrences in the open group (20.7%) compared with 2 recurrences in the laparoscopic group (2.5%). In this series, laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy compares favorably to open ventral herniorrhaphy with respect to wound complications, hospital stay, operative time, and recurrence rate.

摘要

大型和/或复发性腹疝的修复与显著的并发症以及超过50%的复发率相关。腹腔镜腹疝修补术是一项最新进展,已被证明在腹疝修复中安全有效。本研究回顾性分析了1995年11月至1998年12月这3年期间在一家社区教学医院进行的所有腹疝修补术。该研究的目的是比较开放手术和腹腔镜手术修补。在此期间共进行了253例腹疝修补术,其中174例为开放手术,79例为腹腔镜手术。每组的年龄、体重和性别分布相似。开放手术组的疝平均大小为34.1平方厘米,所用补片平均大小为47.3平方厘米。腹腔镜手术组的疝缺损平均为73.0平方厘米,补片大小平均为287.4平方厘米。开放手术组的手术时间较长,分别为82.0分钟和58.0分钟。开放手术组有38例(21.8%)轻微并发症和8例(4.6%)严重并发症,而腹腔镜手术组有13例(16.5%)轻微并发症和2例(2.5%)严重并发症。腹腔镜手术组的住院时间较短,分别为1.7天和2.8天。平均随访21个月(范围2 - 40个月),开放手术组有36例复发(20.7%),而腹腔镜手术组有2例复发(2.5%)。在本系列研究中,腹腔镜腹疝修补术在伤口并发症、住院时间、手术时间和复发率方面优于开放腹疝修补术。

相似文献

1
Comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral herniorrhaphy.腹腔镜与开放性腹疝修补术的比较
Am Surg. 1999 Sep;65(9):827-31; discussion 831-2.
2
Laparoscopic repair of recurrent ventral hernias.复发性腹疝的腹腔镜修补术
Am Surg. 1998 Dec;64(12):1121-5; discussion 1126-7.
3
Laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair: a comparison study.腹腔镜与开放切口疝修补术:一项对比研究。
Surgery. 1998 Oct;124(4):816-21; discussion 821-2. doi: 10.1067/msy.1998.92102.
4
Perioperative outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜腹疝修补术的围手术期结局与并发症
Surgery. 2005 Oct;138(4):708-15; discussion 715-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.054.
5
Polyester-based mesh for ventral hernia repair: is it safe?用于腹疝修补的聚酯基补片:它安全吗?
Am J Surg. 2009 Mar;197(3):353-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.11.003.
6
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: are there comparative advantages over traditional methods of repair?腹腔镜腹疝修补术:与传统修补方法相比有哪些优势?
Am Surg. 2002 Mar;68(3):291-5; discussion 295-6.
7
Laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias.腹腔镜下修复大型切口疝。
Am Surg. 2002 Jun;68(6):530-3; discussion 533-4.
8
Long-term outcomes in laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜与开放腹疝修补术的长期疗效
Arch Surg. 2007 Jun;142(6):562-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.6.562.
9
[Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: our experience and review of the literature].[腹腔镜切口疝修补术:我们的经验及文献综述]
Chir Ital. 2007 Sep-Oct;59(5):671-7.
10
Components separation technique and laparoscopic approach: a review of two evolving strategies for ventral hernia repair.成分分离技术与腹腔镜手术方法:腹疝修补两种不断发展的策略综述
Am Surg. 2005 Jul;71(7):598-605.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing procedural costs and early clinical outcomes of robotic extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair for midline ventral hernias.比较机器人辅助完全腹膜外(eTEP)与腹膜内补片修补术(IPOM)治疗中线腹疝的手术成本和早期临床结果。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):604-613. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11319-3. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
2
Laparoscopic intra-peritoneal onlay mesh plus versus robotic transabdominal pre-peritoneal for primary ventral hernias: Our technique and outcomes.腹腔镜腹腔内补片植入术与机器人经腹腹膜前修补术治疗原发性腹直肌旁疝:我们的技术与结果
J Minim Access Surg. 2025 Jan 1;21(1):25-33. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_4_24. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
3
Comparison between the open and the laparoscopic approach in the primary ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
开放与腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Feb 3;409(1):52. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03241-y.
4
Laparoscopic Umbilical Hernia repair in male patients with abdominal obesity.肥胖男性患者的腹腔镜脐疝修补术
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Sep-Oct;38(7):1776-1779. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.7.6470.
5
Identifying predictors of ventral hernia recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis.识别腹疝复发的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa071.
6
Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: overview of approaches and controversies.原发性非复杂性中线腹前壁疝:治疗方法概述及争议。
Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):885-890. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02037-0. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
7
Short-term comparison between preperitoneal and intraperitoneal onlay mesh placement in robotic ventral hernia repair.机器人腹疝修补术中腹膜前和腹腔内补片放置的短期比较。
Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):957-967. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01946-4. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
8
Current perspectives in robotic hernia repair.机器人疝气修补术的当前观点
Robot Surg. 2017 May 5;4:57-67. doi: 10.2147/RSRR.S101809. eCollection 2017.
9
Laparoscopic versus open emergent ventral hernia repair: utilization and outcomes analysis using the ACSNSQIP database.腹腔镜与开腹紧急腹疝修补术的比较:使用 ACSNSQIP 数据库进行利用和结果分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Dec;32(12):4999-5005. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6312-z. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
10
Outcomes after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: does the number of previous recurrences matter? A prospective study.腹腔镜腹疝修补术后的结果:既往复发次数是否重要?一项前瞻性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4514-4521. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5510-4. Epub 2017 Apr 3.