文拉法辛缓释剂与丁螺环酮治疗广泛性焦虑障碍门诊患者的疗效、安全性及耐受性

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of venlafaxine extended release and buspirone in outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder.

作者信息

Davidson J R, DuPont R L, Hedges D, Haskins J T

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 1999 Aug;60(8):528-35. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v60n0805.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this randomized, double-blind study was to compare the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine extended release (XR) and buspirone in outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) but without concomitant major depressive disorder.

METHOD

Male and female outpatients at least 18 years old who met the DSM-IV criteria for GAD and had scores of 18 or higher on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) were randomly assigned to treatment with either venlafaxine XR (75 or 150 mg/day), buspirone (30 mg/day in 3 divided doses), or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy variables were changes in anxiety as determined by final on-therapy HAM-A total and psychic anxiety scores and Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI) scores. Other key efficacy variables were HAM-A anxious mood and tension scores and the anxiety subscale scores of the patient-rated Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD).

RESULTS

The efficacy analysis included 365 patients and the safety analysis, 405. At week 8, adjusted mean HAM-A psychic anxiety, anxious mood, and tension scores were significantly lower for venlafaxine XR-treated patients than for placebo-treated patients. On the HAD anxiety subscale, venlafaxine XR, 75 or 150 mg/day, was significantly more efficacious than placebo at all time points except weeks 1 (both dosages) and 2 (150-mg/day dosage only) and significantly more efficacious than buspirone at all time points except week 1. On the CGI-Improvement scale, scores for venlafaxine XR (both dosages) and buspirone were numerically superior to those for placebo at all time points, and statistical significance was observed at weeks 3, 4, 6, and 8 for venlafaxine XR and at weeks 6 and 8 for buspirone. The adverse events were not essentially different between treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Venlafaxine XR is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated once-daily anxiolytic agent in patients with GAD without comorbid major depressive disorder. This agent was significantly superior to buspirone on the HAD anxiety subscale. Buspirone demonstrated statistical significance versus placebo on a measure of anxiolytic response.

摘要

背景

这项随机、双盲研究的目的是比较文拉法辛缓释剂(XR)和丁螺环酮在无伴发重度抑郁症的广泛性焦虑症(GAD)门诊患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

年龄至少18岁、符合GAD的DSM-IV标准且汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM-A)评分达到18分或更高的男性和女性门诊患者被随机分配接受文拉法辛XR(75或150毫克/天)、丁螺环酮(30毫克/天,分3次服用)或安慰剂治疗8周。主要疗效变量是治疗结束时HAM-A总分和精神性焦虑评分以及临床总体印象量表(CGI)评分所确定的焦虑变化。其他关键疗效变量是HAM-A焦虑情绪和紧张评分以及患者自评的医院焦虑抑郁量表(HAD)的焦虑子量表评分。

结果

疗效分析纳入365例患者,安全性分析纳入405例。在第8周时,接受文拉法辛XR治疗的患者经调整后的平均HAM-A精神性焦虑、焦虑情绪和紧张评分显著低于接受安慰剂治疗的患者。在HAD焦虑子量表上,文拉法辛XR 75或150毫克/天在除第1周(两种剂量)和第2周(仅150毫克/天剂量)外的所有时间点均显著比安慰剂更有效,且在除第1周外的所有时间点均显著比丁螺环酮更有效。在CGI-改善量表上,文拉法辛XR(两种剂量)和丁螺环酮在所有时间点的评分在数值上均优于安慰剂,文拉法辛XR在第3、4、6和8周以及丁螺环酮在第6和8周观察到统计学显著性。各治疗组之间不良事件无本质差异。

结论

文拉法辛XR是一种有效、安全且耐受性良好的每日一次抗焦虑药物,适用于无伴发重度抑郁症的GAD患者。该药物在HAD焦虑子量表上显著优于丁螺环酮。丁螺环酮在抗焦虑反应测量方面与安慰剂相比显示出统计学显著性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索