Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA.
Cogn Behav Ther. 2020 Jan;49(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2018.1560358. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to provide updated pooled effect sizes of evidence-based psychotherapies and medications for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and to investigate potential moderators of outcomes. Seventy-nine randomized controlled trials (RCT) including 11,002 participants with a diagnosis of GAD were included in a meta-analysis that tested the efficacy of psychotherapies or medications for GAD. Psychotherapy showed a medium to large effect size (= 0.76) and medication showed a small effect size (= 0.38) on GAD outcomes. Psychotherapy also showed a medium effect on depression outcomes (= 0.64) as did medications (= 0.59). Younger age was associated with a larger effect size for psychotherapy (< 0.05). There was evidence of publication bias in psychotherapy studies. This analysis found a medium to large effect for empirically supported psychotherapy interventions on GAD outcomes and a small effect for medications on GAD outcomes. Both groups showed a medium effect on depression outcomes. Because medication studies had more placebo control conditions than inactive conditions compared to psychotherapy studies, effect sizes between the domains should not be compared directly. Patient age should be further investigated as a potential moderator in psychotherapy outcomes in GAD.
本次荟萃分析的目的是提供更新的、基于循证的治疗广泛性焦虑症(GAD)的心理疗法和药物的汇总效应量,并探讨结果的潜在调节因素。共有 79 项随机对照试验(RCT)纳入了 11002 名 GAD 诊断患者,对心理疗法或药物治疗 GAD 的疗效进行了测试。心理疗法对 GAD 结果的影响呈中等至较大(=0.76),药物治疗的影响呈较小(=0.38)。心理疗法对抑郁结果(=0.64)和药物治疗(=0.59)也有中等影响。年龄较小与心理疗法的效应量较大有关(<0.05)。心理疗法研究中存在发表偏倚的证据。本分析发现,经过实证支持的心理疗法干预对 GAD 结果有中等至较大的影响,药物对 GAD 结果的影响较小。两组对抑郁结果的影响均为中等。由于与心理疗法研究相比,药物研究的安慰剂对照条件比无活性对照条件更多,因此不应直接比较两个领域之间的效应量。应进一步研究患者年龄作为 GAD 心理疗法结果的潜在调节因素。