Satyapal K S
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Durban-Westville, Durban, 4000, South Africa.
Anat Rec. 1999 Oct 1;256(2):202-7. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19991001)256:2<202::AID-AR11>3.0.CO;2-B.
Current norms for renal vasculature hold true in only half the population. Standard textbooks perpetuate old misconceptions regarding renal venous anatomy. This study is aimed to determine left and right infra-renal angles (L-IRA, R-IRA); entry level of renal veins into the inferior vena cava (IVC), and height of IVC under renal vein influence; and their vertebral level. One hundred morphologically normal en-bloc renal specimens randomly selected from post-mortem examinations were dissected and resin casted. IRA were also measured from venograms of 32 adult and 11 foetal cadavers, as were vertebral entry levels. IRA measurements (degrees) were as follows: left, 55 degrees +/- 16 degrees (20 degrees -102 degrees ); right, 60 degrees +/- 17 degrees (10 degrees -93 degrees ). Left vein entered IVC higher than right 54%, lower 36%, and opposite each other 10%. Vertical distance between lower borders of veins was 1.0 +/- 0.9 cm. Vertical distance of IVC under renal vein influence was 2.3 +/- 1.0 cm. Vertebral level of veins in adults lies between TI2-L2. In foetuses, IRA was as follows: left, 65 degrees +/- 12 degrees (45 degrees -90 degrees ); right, 58 degrees +/- 7 degrees (40 degrees -70 degrees ); vertebral level between T12 and L3. Similar IRA values from literature noted on right, 51 degrees (26 degrees -100 degrees ); differences on left, 77 degrees (43 degrees -94 degrees ), clearly differing from Williams et al. (Gray's Anatomy, 37(th) ed, 1989) statement that renal veins "open into the inferior vena cava almost at right angles." Large variations of IRA are not surprising since kidneys are considered normally "floating viscera," varying position with posture and respiratory movement as well as in live vs. cadaveric subjects. The entry level into the IVC also differs from Williams et al. This study uniquely quantitated actual height difference between lower borders of left and right veins. The data presented appears to be the first documentation of vertebral level of entry of renal veins into IVC in foetuses. These findings are clinically important for the angiographer, catheter design, and planning porto-renal shunt procedures.
当前关于肾血管系统的标准规范仅适用于一半的人群。标准教科书延续了关于肾静脉解剖结构的旧有误解。本研究旨在确定左右肾下极角(L - IRA,R - IRA);肾静脉进入下腔静脉(IVC)的入口水平,以及在肾静脉影响下下腔静脉的高度;及其椎体水平。从尸检中随机选取100个形态正常的完整肾脏标本进行解剖和树脂铸型。还从32例成人和11例胎儿尸体的静脉造影片上测量了肾下极角以及椎体入口水平。肾下极角的测量值(度)如下:左侧,55度±16度(20度 - 102度);右侧,60度±17度(10度 - 93度)。左肾静脉进入下腔静脉的位置高于右肾静脉的占54%,低于右肾静脉的占36%,两者相对的占10%。静脉下缘之间的垂直距离为1.0±0.9厘米。在肾静脉影响下下腔静脉的垂直距离为2.3±1.0厘米。成人静脉的椎体水平位于T12 - L2之间。在胎儿中,肾下极角如下:左侧,65度±12度(45度 - 90度);右侧,58度±7度(40度 - 70度);椎体水平在T12和L3之间。文献中记录的右侧肾下极角类似值为51度(26度 - 100度);左侧差异为77度(43度 - 94度),明显不同于威廉姆斯等人(《格雷解剖学》第37版,1989年)所述的肾静脉“几乎以直角汇入下腔静脉”。肾下极角的较大变化并不奇怪,因为肾脏通常被认为是“漂浮脏器”,其位置会随姿势、呼吸运动以及活体与尸体状态而变化。肾静脉进入下腔静脉的入口水平也与威廉姆斯等人的描述不同。本研究独特地量化了左右静脉下缘之间的实际高度差异。所呈现的数据似乎是胎儿肾静脉进入下腔静脉椎体水平的首次记录。这些发现对血管造影师、导管设计以及脾肾分流手术规划具有重要临床意义。