Tan K H, Wyldes M P, Settatree R, Mitchell T
Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Singapore Med J. 1999 Apr;40(4):251-5.
To examine the sub-optimal factors relating to the care of stillbirths and neonatal deaths of birthweight 2.5 kg and above.
Regional confidential enquiry into stillbirths and neonatal deaths by multi-disciplinary panel.
All 238 stillbirths and neonatal deaths of 2.5 kg and above in West Midlands Region, UK in the year 1991 were studied. Documents from each death were peer-reviewed by four assessors, one from each of the 4 disciplines, selected randomly from a pool of 24 senior obstetricians, paediatricians, general practitioners and midwives. Panel consensus for each death was reached to identify relevant factors related to sub-optimal care which might have prevented or would reasonably be expected to prevent an adverse outcome (Grades II & III sub-optimal care).
A total of 149 (62.7%) deaths were considered by the panel to have grade II or III factors. Of these, 151 (68.9%) were found in the antepartum period, 44 (20.1%) in the intrapartum period and 24 (11.0%) in the postpartum period. The majority (78.1%) of these factors involved clinical practice of care providers. Factors related to patient/family, equipment and staffing constituted 19.6%, 1.4% and 0.9% respectively. Important sub-optimal factors identified were lack of appreciation of antenatal and intrapartum risks factors (17.8%), the failure of proper interpretation and management of antepartum and intrapartum cardiotocography (12.8%), failure of adherence to accepted practice or standard care (12.8%), inadequate skills in neonatal resuscitation (4.5%) and adverse patient-related factors (19.6%).
Substantial scope exists for confidential multi-disciplinary peer review audit of current obstetric and neonatal care in the region in formulating a strategy to reduce perinatal mortality.
探讨与体重2.5千克及以上死产儿和新生儿死亡护理相关的次优因素。
由多学科小组对死产儿和新生儿死亡进行区域保密调查。
对1991年英国西米德兰兹地区所有238例体重2.5千克及以上的死产儿和新生儿死亡病例进行研究。每例死亡病例的文件由四名评估人员进行同行评审,这四名评估人员分别来自四个学科,从24名资深产科医生、儿科医生、全科医生和助产士中随机挑选。就每例死亡病例达成小组共识,以确定与次优护理相关的可能预防或合理预期可预防不良结局的相关因素(二级和三级次优护理)。
小组认为共有149例(62.7%)死亡病例存在二级或三级因素。其中,151例(68.9%)出现在产前,44例(20.1%)出现在产时,24例(11.0%)出现在产后。这些因素中的大多数(78.1%)涉及护理人员的临床实践。与患者/家庭、设备和人员配备相关的因素分别占19.6%、1.4%和0.9%。确定的重要次优因素包括对产前和产时风险因素认识不足(17.8%)、对产前和产时胎心监护的正确解读和管理失败(12.8%)、未遵循公认的做法或标准护理(12.8%)、新生儿复苏技能不足(4.5%)以及与患者相关的不良因素(19.6%)。
在制定降低围产期死亡率的策略时,该地区目前的产科和新生儿护理进行保密的多学科同行评审审计存在很大空间。