Ando M, Hakoda Y
Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka.
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1999 Jun;70(2):112-9. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.70.112.
Performance superiority of the addition of features in the stimuli over the deletion on recognition (asymmetric confusability effect) has been shown in previous studies (Pezdek, Maki, Valencia-Laver, Whetstone, Stoeckert, & Dougherty, 1988; Ando & Hakoda, 1998). We investigated the same effect by using a familiar living thing (cat) as a stimulus. Ten subjects were given a recognition task using pictures of cats with feature changes (additions, deletions, or no change). Results showed that the picture with deletions were easier to recognize than those with additions, which was opposite to the previous studies. Then, we examined the possibility that performance superiority of the deletions over the additions was mediated by the factor of impression. Another group of 18 subjects was asked to rate the impression scales consisting of a "typicality-reality factor", a "stability-balance factor", and a "grotesque-disgust factor". Results showed that there was a significant difference in impression ratings for each factor between the additions and the deletions, and that impression ratings predicted recognition performance well. It was concluded that performance superiority of the deletions over the additions was mediated by the factor of impression.
先前的研究(Pezdek、Maki、Valencia-Laver、Whetstone、Stoeckert和Dougherty,1988年;Ando和Hakoda,1998年)表明,在识别过程中,刺激物中添加特征比删除特征具有更高的表现优势(不对称混淆效应)。我们通过使用熟悉的生物(猫)作为刺激物来研究相同的效应。十名受试者被给予一项识别任务,任务中使用具有特征变化(添加、删除或无变化)的猫的图片。结果表明,与添加特征的图片相比,删除特征的图片更容易识别,这与先前的研究相反。然后,我们研究了删除特征比添加特征表现更优的情况是否由印象因素介导。另一组18名受试者被要求对由“典型性-现实因素”、“稳定性-平衡因素”和“怪异-厌恶因素”组成的印象量表进行评分。结果表明,添加特征和删除特征在每个因素的印象评分上存在显著差异,并且印象评分能够很好地预测识别表现。研究得出结论,删除特征比添加特征表现更优是由印象因素介导的。