Suppr超能文献

在接受颈动脉内膜切除术的患者中使用术中双功超声检查和常规补片血管成形术。

Use of intraoperative duplex ultrasonography and routine patch angioplasty in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

作者信息

Seelig M H, Oldenburg W A, Chowla A, Atkinson E J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Fla 32224, USA.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 1999 Sep;74(9):870-6. doi: 10.4065/74.9.870.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the value of routine patch angioplasty and intraoperative duplex ultrasonography (US) during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The charts of 102 consecutive patients who underwent CEA with routine patching and intraoperative duplex US for treatment of high-grade carotid stenosis between June 1991 and January 1997 were reviewed retrospectively. Recurrent stenosis was defined as a narrowing in the common or internal carotid artery of more than 40%.

RESULTS

Of 102 patients, 65 (63.7%) were men, and 37 (36.3%) were women (mean age, 72.4 years). Thirteen patients (12.7%) had bilateral CEAs. Intraoperative duplex US revealed abnormalities during 29 (25.2%) of 115 CEAs; 14 abnormalities (12.2%) were major and underwent immediate revision. No perioperative neurologic events or deaths occurred. Mean length of follow-up was 21.3 months (range, 1.3-72.6 months). Late neurologic events occurred in 2 patients, and 5 patients died during follow-up. All neurologic events and deaths were unrelated to the patients' carotid surgery. Twelve patients (11.8%) developed moderate restenosis (40%-69%). In 4 of these patients restenosis resolved during further follow-up. No patient developed severe recurrent carotid stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Morbidity and mortality following CEA with routine patch angioplasty and intraoperative duplex US appear to be low. Routine intraoperative duplex US detects correctable technical problems that subsequently lead to a low incidence of symptomatic stenosis. The low incidence of recurrent stenosis suggests that routine postoperative follow-up may not be necessary or cost-effective unless the patient has symptoms or a contralateral stenosis.

摘要

目的

确定在颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)治疗重度颈内动脉狭窄时,常规补片血管成形术和术中双功超声检查(US)的价值。

患者与方法

回顾性分析1991年6月至1997年1月间连续102例行CEA并采用常规补片和术中双功超声治疗重度颈动脉狭窄患者的病历。复发性狭窄定义为颈总动脉或颈内动脉狭窄超过40%。

结果

102例患者中,男性65例(63.7%),女性37例(36.3%)(平均年龄72.4岁)。13例患者(12.7%)接受双侧CEA。术中双功超声在115例CEA中的29例(25.2%)发现异常;14例异常(12.2%)为严重异常并立即进行了修复。围手术期未发生神经事件或死亡。平均随访时间为21.3个月(范围1.3 - 72.6个月)。随访期间2例患者发生迟发性神经事件,5例患者死亡。所有神经事件和死亡均与患者的颈动脉手术无关。12例患者(11.8%)出现中度再狭窄(40% - 69%)。其中4例患者的再狭窄在进一步随访中缓解。无患者发生严重复发性颈动脉狭窄。

结论

采用常规补片血管成形术和术中双功超声的CEA术后发病率和死亡率似乎较低。常规术中双功超声可检测到可纠正的技术问题,从而导致有症状狭窄的发生率较低。再狭窄发生率低表明,除非患者有症状或对侧狭窄,否则常规术后随访可能不必要或不具有成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验