• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新英格兰血管研究小组颈动脉内膜切除术的术后完成成像。

Completion imaging after carotid endarterectomy in the Vascular Study Group of New England.

机构信息

Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug;54(2):376-85, 385.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.032. Epub 2011 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.032
PMID:21458209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3237118/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We studied surgeons' practice patterns in the use of completion imaging (duplex or arteriography), and their association with 30-day stroke/death and 1-year restenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

METHODS

Using a retrospective analysis of 6115 CEAs, we categorized surgeons based on use of completion imaging as rarely (<5% of CEAs), selective (5% to 90%), or routine (≥90%). Crude and risk-adjusted 30-day stroke/death and 1-year restenosis rates were examined across surgeon practice patterns. Finally, we audited 90 operative reports of patients who underwent re-exploration and characterized findings and interventions. We analyzed the effect of re-exploration on outcomes.

RESULTS

Practice patterns in completion imaging varied: 51% of surgeons performed completion imaging rarely, 22% selectively, and 27% routinely. Crude 30-day stroke/death rates were highest among surgeons who routinely used completion imaging (rarely: 1.7%; selectively: 1.2%, routinely: 2.4%; P = .05). However, after adjusting for patient characteristics predictive of stroke/death, the effect of surgeon practice pattern was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR] for routine-use surgeons, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.93-2.17; P = .10; selective-use surgeons, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.40-1.41; P = .366). Stenosis >70% at 1 year showed a trend toward lowest rates for surgeons who performed completion imaging (rarely: 2.8%, selectively: 1.1%, and routinely: 1.1%; P = .09). This effect became statistically significant for selective-use surgeons after adjustment (hazard risk [HR] for selective-use surgeons, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29-0.92; P = .02). Overall, 178 patients (2.9%) underwent operative re-exploration. Routine-use surgeons were most likely to perform re-exploration (7.6% routine, 0.8% selective, 0.9% rare; P < .001). An audit of 90 re-explored patients demonstrated technical problems, the most common being flap, debris, and plaque. Rates of stroke/death were higher among patients who underwent re-exploration (3.9% vs 1.7%; P = .03); however, this affect was attenuated after adjustment (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.9-5.0; P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of completion imaging during CEA varies widely across our region. There is little evidence that surgeons who use completion imaging have lower rates of 30-day stroke/death, although selective use of completion imaging is associated with a small but a significant reduction in stenosis 1 year after surgery. We also demonstrate an association between re-exploration and higher risk of 30-day stroke/death, although this effect was attenuated after adjustment for patient-level predictors of stroke/death. Future work is needed to direct the selective use of completion imaging to prevent stroke, rather than cause unnecessary re-exploration.

摘要

目的

我们研究了外科医生在使用完成成像(双功能或血管造影)方面的实践模式,以及其与颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后 30 天内卒中/死亡和 1 年内再狭窄的关系。

方法

我们使用 6115 例 CEA 的回顾性分析,根据完成成像的使用情况将外科医生分为很少使用(<5%的 CEA)、选择性(5%至 90%)或常规(≥90%)使用。检查了不同外科医生实践模式下的 30 天内卒中/死亡和 1 年内再狭窄的粗率和风险调整后发生率。最后,我们审核了 90 例接受再次探查的患者的 90 份手术报告,并描述了发现和干预措施。我们分析了再次探查对结果的影响。

结果

完成成像的使用模式差异很大:51%的外科医生很少使用完成成像,22%的外科医生选择性使用,27%的外科医生常规使用。常规使用完成成像的外科医生 30 天内卒中/死亡率最高(很少使用:1.7%;选择性使用:1.2%,常规使用:2.4%;P=0.05)。然而,在调整了预测卒中/死亡的患者特征后,外科医生实践模式的效果没有统计学意义(常规使用外科医生的比值比[OR]为 1.42;95%置信区间,0.93-2.17;P=0.10;选择性使用外科医生的 OR 为 0.75;95%置信区间,0.40-1.41;P=0.366)。1 年内狭窄>70%的患者,进行完成成像的外科医生的发生率最低(很少使用:2.8%,选择性使用:1.1%,常规使用:1.1%;P=0.09)。在调整后,选择性使用外科医生的这一效果具有统计学意义(选择性使用外科医生的危险比[HR]为 0.52;95%置信区间,0.29-0.92;P=0.02)。总体而言,178 例患者(2.9%)接受了手术再次探查。常规使用外科医生最有可能进行再次探查(常规使用:7.6%,选择性使用:0.8%,很少使用:0.9%;P<0.001)。对 90 例再次探查的患者进行了审核,发现了技术问题,最常见的是瓣、碎片和斑块。再次探查的患者卒中/死亡率更高(3.9%比 1.7%;P=0.03);然而,调整后这种影响减弱(OR,2.1;95%置信区间,0.9-5.0;P=0.08)。

结论

我们所在地区的 CEA 术中完成成像的使用差异很大。尽管选择性使用完成成像与术后 1 年内狭窄程度略有但显著降低有关,但没有证据表明使用完成成像的外科医生卒中/死亡率较低。我们还证明了再次探查与 30 天内卒中/死亡风险增加之间存在关联,尽管这种关联在调整了卒中/死亡的患者预测因素后有所减弱。需要进一步的工作来指导选择性使用完成成像以预防卒中,而不是导致不必要的再次探查。

相似文献

1
Completion imaging after carotid endarterectomy in the Vascular Study Group of New England.新英格兰血管研究小组颈动脉内膜切除术的术后完成成像。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug;54(2):376-85, 385.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.032. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
2
Practice patterns in the use of completion imaging after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后应用完善成像的实践模式。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jan;73(1):151-160.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.05.075. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
3
Impact of practice patterns in shunt use during carotid endarterectomy with contralateral carotid occlusion.在伴有对侧颈动脉闭塞的颈动脉内膜切除术中转流管使用实践模式的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jan;55(1):61-71.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.046. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
4
Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with prior ipsilateral carotid artery stenting.既往同侧颈动脉支架置入患者行内膜切除术与支架置入术的比较
J Vasc Surg. 2017 May;65(5):1418-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.041. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
5
Stenting versus endarterectomy after prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy.既往同侧颈动脉内膜剥脱术后支架置入术与内膜剥脱术的比较
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;65(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.115. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
6
Regional use of combined carotid endarterectomy/coronary artery bypass graft and the effect of patient risk.颈动脉内膜切除术/冠状动脉旁路移植术的区域性应用及患者风险的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Sep;56(3):668-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.02.028. Epub 2012 May 5.
7
Characterization of perioperative contralateral stroke after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后围手术期对侧卒中的特征描述
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1450-1456. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.059. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
8
Early carotid endarterectomy performed 2 to 5 days after the onset of neurologic symptoms leads to comparable results to carotid endarterectomy performed at later time points.在神经症状出现后2至5天内进行早期颈动脉内膜切除术,其结果与在更晚时间点进行颈动脉内膜切除术相当。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Dec;66(6):1719-1726. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.101. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
9
The detrimental impact of silent cerebral infarcts on asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy outcome.无症状性脑梗死对无症状颈动脉内膜切除术预后的不利影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.049. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
10
The effect of surgeon's specialty and volume on the perioperative outcome of carotid endarterectomy.外科医生的专业和手术量对颈动脉内膜切除术围手术期结果的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Sep;58(3):666-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.02.016. Epub 2013 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Intraoperative completion studies in carotid endarterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of techniques and outcomes.颈动脉内膜切除术的术中完成研究:技术与结果的系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(14):1201. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-2931.
2
[Intraoperative angiography in carotid artery reconstruction-Pathological findings, reliability and importance of the procedure].[颈动脉重建术中的术中血管造影——该操作的病理结果、可靠性及重要性]
Chirurg. 2021 Dec;92(12):1123-1131. doi: 10.1007/s00104-021-01403-y. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
3
Applications of intraoperative Duplex ultrasound in vascular surgery: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy in a multicenter regional registry.多中心区域性注册研究中的颈动脉内膜切除术术后再狭窄。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Oct;52(4):897-904, 905.e1-2; discussion 904-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.005.
2
Intraoperative duplex ultrasonography in carotid endarterectomy: the impact on indication for immediate revision and intermediate-term outcome.颈动脉内膜切除术术中双功超声检查:对即刻翻修指征及中期结局的影响
Vasa. 2008 May;37(2):151-6. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526.37.2.151.
3
Factors associated with stroke or death after carotid endarterectomy in Northern New England.
术中双功超声在血管外科中的应用:一项系统评价。
Ultrasound J. 2021 Feb 19;13(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13089-021-00208-8.
4
Association of Quality Improvement Registry Participation With Appropriate Follow-up After Vascular Procedures.质量改进登记参与与血管手术后适当随访的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Mar 1;153(3):216-223. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3942.
5
Carotid Endarterectomy in the Southern California Vascular Outcomes Improvement Collaborative.南加州血管结局改善协作组中的颈动脉内膜切除术
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Jul;42:11-15. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.11.007. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
6
Asymptomatic dissecting intimal lesions of common carotid arteries after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后颈总动脉无症状性内膜剥离病变
Surg Today. 2015 Oct;45(10):1227-32. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-1018-x. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
7
Clinical relevance of cranial nerve injury following carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后面神经损伤的临床相关性。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;47(1):2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.09.022. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
新英格兰北部颈动脉内膜切除术后与中风或死亡相关的因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Nov;48(5):1139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
4
Intraoperative imaging: does it really improve perioperative outcomes of carotid endarterectomy?术中成像:它真的能改善颈动脉内膜切除术的围手术期结局吗?
Semin Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;20(4):236-43. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2007.10.003.
5
A regional registry for quality assurance and improvement: the Vascular Study Group of Northern New England (VSGNNE).一个用于质量保证和改进的区域登记处:新英格兰北部血管研究小组(VSGNNE)。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;46(6):1093-1101; discussion 1101-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.08.012. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
6
Methodologic challenges to studying patient safety and comparative effectiveness.研究患者安全与比较效果的方法学挑战。
Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10 Supl 2):S13-5. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318041f752.
7
Intraoperative carotid artery duplex scanning in a modern series of 650 consecutive primary endarterectomy procedures.在一系列连续650例现代原发性动脉内膜切除术手术中进行术中颈动脉双功扫描。
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Feb;39(2):416-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.09.019.
8
Intraoperative duplex ultrasonography as an adjunct to technical excellence in 100 consecutive carotid endarterectomies.术中双功超声检查辅助100例连续颈动脉内膜切除术实现技术卓越。
Am J Surg. 2003 May;185(5):445-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(03)00039-4.
9
Intraoperative duplex ultrasound during carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术期间的术中双功超声检查。
Vasc Surg. 2001 Jan-Feb;35(1):1-9. doi: 10.1177/153857440103500102.
10
Carotid endarterectomy with normal findings from a completion study: Is there need for early duplex scan?颈动脉内膜切除术在完成研究中结果正常:是否需要早期进行双功超声扫描?
J Vasc Surg. 2001 May;33(5):963-7. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.115001.