Solanki G, Schauffler H H
University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health, 94720-7360, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Aug;17(2):127-33. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00057-4.
Little is known about the effect of different forms of patient cost-sharing on the utilization of clinical preventive services or if the effect varies by type of health plan.
To assess empirically the relationships between the utilization of recommended preventive services and different forms of patient cost-sharing and how the effect is mediated by type of preventive service (counseling, blood pressure, Pap smear, mammogram), type of cost-sharing (deductibles/coinsurance, copayments), and type of health plan (HMO, PPO/indemnity plan).
Sixteen logit models were estimated to assess variation in receiving recommended preventive care as a function of cost-sharing within plan type.
A sample of 10,872 employees, aged 18 to 64 years, of seven large companies served by 52 health plans with diverse cost-sharing arrangements who responded to the Pacific Business Group on Health, Health Plan Value Check Survey (response rate, 50.3%).
Receipt of recommended preventive care was based on the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines. The effect of cost-sharing was measured as the percentage change in the probability of receiving recommended preventive care in the cost-sharing group compared to the non cost-sharing group.
The negative effect of patient cost-sharing was greatest on preventive counseling in PPO/indemnity plans (-15%) and on mammograms in all health plan types (-9%-10%). The effect on Pap smears was negative (-8%-10%) for deductibles/coinsurance in PPO/indemnity plans and copayments in HMOs. The effect of cost-sharing on blood pressure was mixed. Deductibles/coinsurance had a greater negative effect than copayments.
Eliminating patient cost-sharing for selected preventive services may be a relatively easy and effective means of increasing utilization of recommended clinical preventive care.
对于不同形式的患者费用分担对临床预防服务利用的影响,或者这种影响是否因健康计划类型而异,人们了解甚少。
实证评估推荐预防服务的利用与不同形式的患者费用分担之间的关系,以及这种影响如何通过预防服务类型(咨询、血压、巴氏涂片、乳房X光检查)、费用分担类型(免赔额/共保、自付费用)和健康计划类型(健康维护组织、优先提供者组织/赔偿计划)来介导。
估计了16个逻辑模型,以评估在计划类型内作为费用分担函数的接受推荐预防护理的差异。
来自7家大公司的10872名年龄在18至64岁之间的员工样本,这些公司由52个具有不同费用分担安排的健康计划提供服务,他们回应了太平洋商业健康集团的健康计划价值检查调查(回应率为50.3%)。
接受推荐预防护理基于美国预防服务工作组指南。费用分担的影响以费用分担组与非费用分担组相比接受推荐预防护理概率的百分比变化来衡量。
患者费用分担对优先提供者组织/赔偿计划中的预防咨询(-15%)和所有健康计划类型中的乳房X光检查(-9%-10%)负面影响最大。对于优先提供者组织/赔偿计划中的免赔额/共保和健康维护组织中的自付费用,对巴氏涂片的影响为负面(-8%-10%)。费用分担对血压的影响好坏参半。免赔额/共保的负面影响大于自付费用。
消除选定预防服务的患者费用分担可能是增加推荐临床预防护理利用的一种相对简单有效的手段。