Levy E I, Firlik A D, Wisniewski S, Rubin G, Jungreis C A, Wechsler L R, Yonas H
Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania 15213-2582, USA.
Neurosurgery. 1999 Sep;45(3):539-45; discussion 545-8. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199909000-00025.
To determine whether recanalization, coma at presentation, or clot location in the basilar artery influences the relative mortality risk after intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy for acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusions.
Studies were identified using the MEDLINE database for January 1987 to November 1997. Series were included if they involved 10 or more patients with basilar or vertebrobasilar artery occlusions, used urokinase and/or recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, and were written in English. A fixed-effect meta-analysis approach was used to estimate the risk of death with the aforementioned risk factors. Each study was weighted according to sample size. Relative risks were calculated with 95% confidence intervals.
As calculated from peer-reviewed published data, the relative mortality risk for patients for whom recanalization was attempted but not achieved was 2.34 (95% confidence interval, 1.48-3.71; n = 126). Coma at presentation was associated with a relative mortality risk of 1.95 (95% confidence interval, 1.26-2.99; n = 145). Clot locations in the distal one-third of the basilar artery were shown to favor survival, compared with clots located in the proximal and/or middle portions of the basilar artery (relative risk, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.86; n = 126).
The combined data suggest that coma at presentation has an independent and adverse effect on survival rates. Complete recanalization, distal clot location, and responsiveness at the time of presentation are statistically significant factors for increased patient survival rates.
确定再通、就诊时昏迷或基底动脉内血栓位置是否会影响急性椎基底动脉闭塞动脉内溶栓治疗后的相对死亡风险。
使用MEDLINE数据库检索1987年1月至1997年11月的研究。纳入的系列研究需满足以下条件:涉及10例或更多基底动脉或椎基底动脉闭塞患者、使用尿激酶和/或重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂且为英文撰写。采用固定效应荟萃分析方法评估上述危险因素导致的死亡风险。每项研究根据样本量进行加权。计算相对风险及95%置信区间。
根据同行评审发表的数据计算,尝试再通但未成功的患者相对死亡风险为2.34(95%置信区间,1.48 - 3.71;n = 126)。就诊时昏迷与相对死亡风险1.95相关(95%置信区间,1.26 - 2.99;n = 145)。与位于基底动脉近端和/或中部的血栓相比,位于基底动脉远端三分之一处的血栓显示更有利于生存(相对风险,0.52;95%置信区间,0.31 - 0.86;n = 126)。
综合数据表明,就诊时昏迷对生存率有独立的不利影响。完全再通、远端血栓位置以及就诊时的反应性是患者生存率提高的统计学显著因素。