Griswold D E, Douglas S A, Martin L D, Davis T G, Davis L, Ao Z, Luttmann M A, Pullen M, Nambi P, Hay D W, Ohlstein E H
Department of Pulmonary Pharmacology, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406-0939, USA.
Mol Pharmacol. 1999 Oct;56(4):807-12.
The role of endothelin B (ET(B)) receptors in inflammation and nociception was examined using ET(B) receptor knockout mice. Genotyping studies were used with tissues from ET(B)((+/+)), ET(B)((+/-)), and ET(B)((-/-)) mice to confirm the loss of ET(B) receptors. Algesia induced by phenylbenzoquinone was evident in the (+/+) mice, reduced by approximately 80% in the (+/-) mice, and absent in the (-/-) mice. Phenylbenzoquinone-induced algesia in (+/+) mice was inhibited 74% by the ET(B) receptor-selective antagonist A192621 (25 mg/kg p.o.), but unaffected by the ET(A) receptor-selective antagonist SB 234551 (25 mg/kg p.o.). Noninflammatory pain, induced by hotplate, was equivalent between (+/+) and (-/-) mice. The cutaneous inflammatory response to topical arachidonic acid (AA) also was evaluated. Whereas (+/+) mice had a marked inflammatory response to AA, the (+/-), and (-/-) mice had significantly reduced fluid phase responses (37 and 65% inhibition, respectively). Neutrophil infiltration also was reduced in the (+/-) and (-/-) mice (51 and 65% reduction, respectively). Topical administration of A192621 (500 microg/ear) in (+/+) mice inhibited AA-induced swelling (39%), whereas SB 234551 (500 microg/ear) was without effect. Collectively, these results implicate the ET(B) receptor in mediation of inflammatory pain and cutaneous inflammatory responses in mice.
利用内皮素B(ET(B))受体基因敲除小鼠研究了ET(B)受体在炎症和痛觉感受中的作用。通过对ET(B)((+/+))、ET(B)((+/-))和ET(B)((-/-))小鼠的组织进行基因分型研究,以确认ET(B)受体的缺失。苯醌诱导的痛觉过敏在(+/+)小鼠中明显,在(+/-)小鼠中降低了约80%,而在(-/-)小鼠中不存在。ET(B)受体选择性拮抗剂A192621(25mg/kg口服)可抑制(+/+)小鼠中苯醌诱导的痛觉过敏74%,但不受ET(A)受体选择性拮抗剂SB 234551(25mg/kg口服)的影响。热板诱导的非炎性疼痛在(+/+)和(-/-)小鼠之间相当。还评估了对局部花生四烯酸(AA)的皮肤炎症反应。虽然(+/+)小鼠对AA有明显的炎症反应,但(+/-)和(-/-)小鼠的液相反应明显降低(分别抑制37%和65%)。(+/-)和(-/-)小鼠中的中性粒细胞浸润也减少(分别减少51%和65%)。在(+/+)小鼠中局部给予A192621(500μg/耳)可抑制AA诱导的肿胀(39%),而SB 234551(500μg/耳)则无作用。总体而言,这些结果表明ET(B)受体参与介导小鼠的炎性疼痛和皮肤炎症反应。