Gomez F, Grigson P S
Department of Behavioral Science, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey 17033, USA.
Physiol Behav. 1999 Sep;67(3):351-7. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(99)00079-7.
Suppression of intake of a gustatory conditioned stimulus (CS) occurs when paired with either an aversive or an appetitive unconditioned stimulus (US). Toxic substances, such as lithium chloride (LiCl), induce conditioned taste aversions while rewarding stimuli, such as high a concentration of sucrose, reduce intake through a comparison process referred to as anticipatory contrast. Drugs of abuse also suppress CS intake, but it is not known whether they do so via their rewarding or aversive properties. Using 0.1, 0.3, or 0.5 M sucrose solutions as the gustatory CS, we compared the suppressive effects of LiCl (5.29 mg/kg), morphine (15 mg/kg), cocaine (10 mg/kg), and a 1.0-M sucrose solution in rats that were food deprived. The doses of the three drugs have been equated in terms of their suppressive effects in water-deprived and free-feeding rats. The results showed that in food-deprived rats the sucrose US failed to suppress intake of any of the sucrose CSs, the drugs of abuse failed to suppress intake of the 0.3 and 0.5-M concentration of sucrose, and LiCl failed to suppress intake of the 0.5-M sucrose solution. When taken together, these findings reveal that the suppressive effects of all USs (aversive, appetitive, and drugs of abuse) can be offset by the use of a caloric CS when evaluated in food-deprived rats.
当味觉条件刺激(CS)与厌恶或喜好性非条件刺激(US)配对时,其摄入量会受到抑制。有毒物质,如氯化锂(LiCl),会诱发条件性味觉厌恶,而奖励性刺激,如高浓度蔗糖,则通过一种称为预期对比的比较过程来减少摄入量。滥用药物也会抑制CS的摄入量,但尚不清楚它们是通过其奖励性还是厌恶性质来做到这一点。我们以0.1、0.3或0.5 M的蔗糖溶液作为味觉CS,比较了LiCl(5.29 mg/kg)、吗啡(15 mg/kg)、可卡因(10 mg/kg)和1.0 M蔗糖溶液对饥饿大鼠的抑制作用。这三种药物的剂量在缺水和自由进食的大鼠中,就其抑制作用而言已进行了等效处理。结果表明,在饥饿大鼠中,蔗糖US未能抑制任何一种蔗糖CS的摄入量,滥用药物未能抑制0.3和0.5 M浓度蔗糖的摄入量,LiCl未能抑制0.5 M蔗糖溶液的摄入量。综合来看,这些发现表明,在饥饿大鼠中进行评估时,所有US(厌恶、喜好和滥用药物)的抑制作用都可以通过使用热量CS来抵消。