Grigson P S, Lyuboslavsky P, Tanase D
Department of Behavioral Science, Penn State College of Medicine, H181, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033-2390, USA.
Brain Res. 2000 Mar 10;858(2):327-37. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)01939-9.
Rats decrease intake of a saccharin conditioned stimulus (CS) when followed by: (1) the administration of an aversive agent such as lithium chloride (referred to as a conditioned taste aversion, CTA); (2) access to a very palatable concentration of sucrose (referred to as an anticipatory contrast effect, ACE); or (3) the administration of a drug of abuse. It is not clear, however, whether the suppressive effects of drugs of abuse are mediated by their aversive or rewarding properties. The present set of experiments addressed this issue by examining the suppressive effects of morphine in rats with a lesion thought to dissociate the two phenomena (i.e., CTA and ACE). The results show that bilateral ibotenic acid lesions of the gustatory thalamus eliminate the suppressive effects of morphine, but fail to disrupt the suppressive effects of the aversive agent, lithium chloride. This pattern of results argues against the CTA account in favor of the reward comparison hypothesis. Specifically, the data suggest that rats suppress intake of a saccharin CS in anticipation of the availability of a preferred drug of abuse and that the gustatory thalamus is essential for this type of reward comparison process.
当出现以下情况时,大鼠会减少对糖精条件刺激(CS)的摄入量:(1)给予厌恶剂,如氯化锂(称为条件性味觉厌恶,CTA);(2)给予浓度非常可口的蔗糖(称为预期对比效应,ACE);或(3)给予滥用药物。然而,目前尚不清楚滥用药物的抑制作用是由其厌恶特性还是奖赏特性介导的。本系列实验通过检查吗啡对被认为可使这两种现象(即CTA和ACE)分离的损伤大鼠的抑制作用,来解决这个问题。结果表明,味觉丘脑的双侧异搏定酸损伤消除了吗啡的抑制作用,但未能破坏厌恶剂氯化锂的抑制作用。这种结果模式反对CTA解释,支持奖赏比较假说。具体而言,数据表明大鼠在预期可获得偏爱的滥用药物时会抑制对糖精CS的摄入,并且味觉丘脑对于这种奖赏比较过程至关重要。