Virta A, Barnett A, Pierpaoli C
Neuroimaging Branch, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Oct;17(8):1121-33. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(99)00048-x.
We used diffusion tensor imaging to assess diffusion anisotropy in the pyramidal tract in ten young, and ten elderly subjects (five males and five females in each group). The purpose of this study was to define normative values for anisotropy at different anatomic levels of the brainstem as well as to assess differences due to age, gender, and laterality. In all subjects, anisotropy was highest in the cerebral peduncle, lowest in the caudal pons, and intermediate in the medulla. In the pons and medulla the regional variability was high, with significant differences in anisotropy even between contiguous slices. Multifactorial ANOVA (performed using the average value of anisotropy within each region of interest) revealed that elderly subjects had significantly lower values than young subjects in the cerebral peduncle, with no differences in the pons and medulla. No significant differences in anisotropy due to gender and side were found. The differences in anisotropy at different levels of the brainstem reflect differences in the local architecture of white matter fibers. Anisotropy is high in the cerebral peduncle because fibers have a highly ordered arrangement, while in the pons and medulla, anisotropy is lower because the local fiber architecture is less coherent due to the presence of other fibers and nuclei. The biologic meaning of the intergroup differences in anisotropy is discussed in light of the structure and architecture of the tissue under investigation. We also consider potential sources of artifacts, such as noise and motion, partial volume contamination, anatomic mismatching, and the use of inappropriate statistical tests. We conclude that the age-related decrease in anisotropy in the cerebral peduncle is not artifactual but rather reflects subtle structural changes of the aging white matter. Our study however shows that caution must be exercised in interpreting diffusion anisotropy data.
我们使用扩散张量成像技术评估了10名年轻受试者和10名老年受试者(每组各5名男性和5名女性)锥体束中的扩散各向异性。本研究的目的是确定脑干不同解剖水平各向异性的标准值,并评估年龄、性别和左右侧性导致的差异。在所有受试者中,大脑脚的各向异性最高,脑桥尾部最低,延髓的各向异性处于中间水平。在脑桥和延髓,区域变异性较高,即使相邻切片之间的各向异性也存在显著差异。多因素方差分析(使用每个感兴趣区域内各向异性的平均值进行)显示,老年受试者大脑脚的各向异性值显著低于年轻受试者,而脑桥和延髓则无差异。未发现因性别和左右侧性导致的各向异性显著差异。脑干不同水平的各向异性差异反映了白质纤维局部结构的差异。大脑脚的各向异性较高,因为纤维排列高度有序,而在脑桥和延髓,各向异性较低,因为由于其他纤维和核的存在,局部纤维结构不太连贯。根据所研究组织的结构和构造,讨论了各向异性组间差异的生物学意义。我们还考虑了伪影的潜在来源,如噪声和运动、部分容积污染、解剖不匹配以及使用不适当的统计检验。我们得出结论,大脑脚中与年龄相关的各向异性降低并非人为造成,而是反映了老化白质的细微结构变化。然而,我们的研究表明,在解释扩散各向异性数据时必须谨慎。