Rimensberger P C, Pristine G, Mullen B M, Cox P N, Slutsky A S
Department of Critical Care, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 1999 Sep;27(9):1940-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199909000-00037.
Ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) above the inflection point (P(inf)) has been shown to reduce lung injury by recruiting previously closed alveolar regions; however, it carries the risk of hyperinflating the lungs. The present study examined the hypothesis that a new strategy of recruiting the lung with a sustained inflation (SI), followed by ventilation with small tidal volumes, would allow the maintenance of low PEEP levels (<P(inf)) without inducing additional lung injury.
Prospective, randomized, controlled ex vivo study.
An animal laboratory in a university setting.
Isolated nonperfused lungs of adult Sprague-Dawley rats.
We studied the effect on compliance and lung injury in four groups (n = 10 per group) of lavaged rat lungs. One group (group 1) served as a control; their lungs were inflated at PEEP < P(inf) but not ventilated. The other three groups were ventilated with small tidal volumes (5 to 6 mL/kg) for 2 hrs with the following interventions: group 2, PEEP < P(inf) without SI; group 3, PEEP < P(inf) after a SI to 30 cm H2O for 30 secs; and group 4, PEEP > P(inf).
In groups 2 and 4, static compliance decreased after ventilation (p < .01). Histologically, group 2 (PEEP < P(inf) without SI) showed significantly greater injury of small airways, but not of terminal respiratory units, compared with group 1. Group 3 (PEEP < P(inf) after a SI), but not group 4, showed significantly less injury of small airways and terminal respiratory units compared with group 2.
We conclude that small tidal volume ventilation after a recruitment maneuver allows ventilation on the deflation limb of the pressure/volume curve of the lungs at a PEEP < P(inf). This strategy a) minimizes lung injury as well as, or better than, use of PEEP > P(inf), and b) ensures a lower PEEP, which may minimize the detrimental consequences of high lung volume ventilation.
呼气末正压(PEEP)高于拐点(P(inf))的通气已被证明可通过使先前关闭的肺泡区域复张来减少肺损伤;然而,它存在使肺过度膨胀的风险。本研究检验了以下假设:一种新的策略,即先进行持续肺膨胀(SI)使肺复张,然后采用小潮气量通气,将能够维持低PEEP水平(<P(inf))而不引起额外的肺损伤。
前瞻性、随机、对照的离体研究。
大学环境中的动物实验室。
成年Sprague-Dawley大鼠的离体无灌注肺。
我们研究了四组(每组n = 10)灌洗大鼠肺对顺应性和肺损伤的影响。一组(第1组)作为对照;其肺在PEEP < P(inf)下充气但不通气。其他三组用小潮气量(5至6 mL/kg)通气2小时,并采取以下干预措施:第2组,PEEP < P(inf)且无SI;第3组,在SI至30 cm H2O持续30秒后PEEP < P(inf);第4组,PEEP > P(inf)。
在第2组和第4组中,通气后静态顺应性降低(p < .01)。组织学上,与第1组相比,第2组(PEEP < P(inf)且无SI)显示小气道损伤明显更严重,但终末呼吸单位无明显损伤。与第2组相比,第3组(SI后PEEP < P(inf))而非第4组,显示小气道和终末呼吸单位损伤明显更少。
我们得出结论,在进行复张操作后采用小潮气量通气可使肺在PEEP < P(inf)时在压力/容积曲线的呼气支上进行通气。该策略a)与使用PEEP > P(inf)相比,能将肺损伤降至最低或更好,b)确保更低的PEEP,这可能将高肺容积通气的有害后果降至最低。