Haveman J W, Muller Kobold A C, Tervaert J W, van den Berg A P, Tulleken J E, Kallenberg C G, The T H
Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.
Neth J Med. 1999 Sep;55(3):132-41. doi: 10.1016/s0300-2977(98)00156-9.
Despite important advances in critical care medicine during the last two decades, the mortality rate of sepsis has remained high, probably because the pathogenesis of sepsis is still incompletely understood. Recent studies have shown that sepsis is a bimodal entity. The first phase is characterized by the systemic release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-1 (IL-1), and IL-8, and by activation of the complement and coagulation cascades. In the second phase, anti-inflammatory mediators such as transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), IL-10 and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) may be released in an effort to counteract ongoing inflammation. Depending whether the pro- or anti-inflammatory response predominates, sepsis results in a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), or a compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome (CARS). So far, most efforts to intervene in the immunopathogenesis of sepsis have been directed at the pro-inflammatory response. None of these interventions has been shown to improve the prognosis of sepsis, possibly because many patients were already in a state in which anti-inflammatory responses dominated. Recently, it has been shown that decreased expression of HLA-DR on monocytes in patients with sepsis constitutes a marker for CARS. We suggest that HLA-DR expression on monocytes might constitute a useful indicator of the immunological status of the individual patient with sepsis and a guide for treatment. Patients with CARS, as manifested by low HLA-DR expression, might benefit from immunostimulants, while patients with SIRS and normal or high monocyte HLA-DR expression should receive treatment directed to interfere with pro-inflammatory pathways.
尽管在过去二十年中重症监护医学取得了重要进展,但脓毒症的死亡率仍然很高,这可能是因为脓毒症的发病机制仍未完全明了。最近的研究表明,脓毒症是一种双峰现象。第一阶段的特征是促炎细胞因子如肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-1(IL-1)和IL-8的全身释放,以及补体和凝血级联反应的激活。在第二阶段,抗炎介质如转化生长因子-β(TGF-β)、IL-10和前列腺素E2(PGE2)可能会释放出来,以对抗持续的炎症。根据促炎或抗炎反应哪一个占主导,脓毒症会导致全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)或代偿性抗炎反应综合征(CARS)。到目前为止,大多数干预脓毒症免疫发病机制的努力都针对促炎反应。这些干预措施均未显示能改善脓毒症的预后,可能是因为许多患者已经处于抗炎反应占主导的状态。最近,研究表明脓毒症患者单核细胞上HLA-DR表达降低是CARS的一个标志。我们认为,单核细胞上HLA-DR表达可能是脓毒症个体患者免疫状态的一个有用指标和治疗指南。以低HLA-DR表达为表现的CARS患者可能从免疫刺激剂中获益,而SIRS且单核细胞HLA-DR表达正常或高的患者应接受旨在干扰促炎途径的治疗。