Kuehne J, Frankhouse J, Modrall G, Golshani S, Aziz I, Demetriades D, Yellin A E
Los Angeles County+University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles 90033, USA.
Am Surg. 1999 Oct;65(10):976-81.
Inferior vena cava (IVC) injuries continue to be associated with mortality rates of 21 to 66 per cent despite advances in prehospital, surgical, and critical care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcome of patients with IVC injury after treatment at a major urban trauma center and to identify factors predictive of survival. Between 1989 and 1995, 158 patients presented to the Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center with IVC injuries. One hundred thirty-six patient records were available for review, and 69 data points were collected and analyzed. Mean age was 26 years (range, 6-54), and 122 (90%) patients were male. Mechanism of injury included gunshot in 88 (65%) patients, stab in 23 (17%) patients, shotgun in 7 (5%) patients, and blunt trauma in 18 (13%) patients. The mean Injury Severity Score was 25. Seventy (52%) patients were hypotensive. Eleven (8%) patients died before surgical intervention, and 25 (18%) patients died before operative repair. Repair (79), ligation (20), or observation (1) was accomplished in 100 (74%) patients. Overall survival was 48 per cent and 65 per cent in the 100 patients surviving to operative repair, including 5 of 20 patients requiring IVC ligation. Significant differences (P<0.001) between survivors and nonsurvivors included Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Score, hematocrit, hypotension, emergent thoracotomy, blood loss, level of injury, tamponade, and associated aortic injury. Logistic regression analysis identified hypotension, anatomic level of injury, and associated aortic injury as significant predictors of outcome (P = 0.001). Survival is predominantly determined by severity and anatomic accessibility of the IVC injury and by the absence of associated major vascular injuries. Ligation may control otherwise exsanguinating injuries and should be considered early in the management of complex injuries.
尽管在院前、手术及重症监护方面取得了进展,但下腔静脉(IVC)损伤的死亡率仍在21%至66%之间。本研究的目的是评估在一家大型城市创伤中心接受治疗的IVC损伤患者的预后,并确定预测生存的因素。1989年至1995年间,158例IVC损伤患者被送往洛杉矶县+南加州大学医学中心。136份患者记录可供审查,并收集和分析了69个数据点。平均年龄为26岁(范围6至54岁),122例(90%)患者为男性。损伤机制包括88例(65%)枪击伤、23例(17%)刺伤、7例(5%)霰弹枪伤和18例(13%)钝性创伤。平均损伤严重度评分是25分。70例(52%)患者出现低血压。11例(8%)患者在手术干预前死亡,25例(18%)患者在手术修复前死亡。100例(74%)患者完成了修复(79例)、结扎(20例)或观察(1例)。在100例存活至手术修复的患者中,总体生存率为48%,在包括20例需要IVC结扎的患者中有5例存活,总体生存率为65%。幸存者和非幸存者之间的显著差异(P<0.001)包括损伤严重度评分、格拉斯哥昏迷评分、血细胞比容、低血压、急诊开胸手术、失血量、损伤水平、填塞和相关主动脉损伤。逻辑回归分析确定低血压、损伤的解剖水平和相关主动脉损伤是预后的重要预测因素(P = 0.001)。生存主要取决于IVC损伤的严重程度和解剖可及性以及是否存在相关的主要血管损伤。结扎可能控制原本会导致出血不止的损伤,在复杂损伤的处理中应尽早考虑。