Ton J, Pieterse C M, Van Loon L C
Graduate School of Experimental Plant Sciences, Section of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Biology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1999 Oct;12(10):911-8. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.10.911.
Selected nonpathogenic rhizobacteria with biological disease control activity are able to elicit an induced systemic resistance (ISR) response that is phenotypically similar to pathogen-induced systemic acquired resistance (SAR). Ten ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana were screened for their potential to express rhizobacteria-mediated ISR and pathogen-induced SAR against the leaf pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst). All ecotypes expressed SAR. However, of the 10 ecotypes tested, ecotypes RLD and Wassilewskija (Ws) did not develop ISR after treatment of the roots with nonpathogenic Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS417r bacteria. This nonresponsive phenotype was associated with relatively high susceptibility to Pst infection. The F1 progeny of crosses between the non-responsive ecotypes RLD and Ws on the one hand, and the responsive ecotypes Columbia (Col) and Landsberg erecta (Ler) on the other hand, were fully capable of expressing ISR and exhibited a relatively high level of basal resistance, similar to that of their WCS417r-responsive parent. This indicates that the potential to express ISR and the relatively high level of basal resistance against Pst are both inherited as dominant traits. Analysis of the F2 and F3 progeny of a Col x RLD cross revealed that inducibility of ISR and relatively high basal resistance against Pst cosegregate in a 3:1 fashion, suggesting that both resistance mechanisms are monogenically determined and genetically linked. Neither the responsiveness to WCS417r nor the relatively high level of basal resistance against Pst were complemented in the F1 progeny of crosses between RLD and Ws, indicating that RLD and Ws are both affected in the same locus, necessary for the expression of ISR and basal resistance against Pst. The corresponding locus, designated ISR1, was mapped between markers B4 and GL1 on chromosome 3. The observed association between ISR and basal resistance against Pst suggests that rhizobacteria-mediated ISR against Pst in Arabidopsis requires the presence of a single dominant gene that functions in the basal resistance response against Pst infection.
具有生物病害防治活性的特定非致病性根际细菌能够引发诱导系统抗性(ISR)反应,该反应在表型上类似于病原体诱导的系统获得性抗性(SAR)。对10种拟南芥生态型进行了筛选,以评估它们表达根际细菌介导的ISR以及针对叶部病原体丁香假单胞菌番茄致病变种DC3000(Pst)的病原体诱导SAR的潜力。所有生态型均表达SAR。然而,在测试的10种生态型中,用非致病性荧光假单胞菌WCS417r处理根部后,RLD和Wassilewskija(Ws)生态型未产生ISR。这种无反应表型与对Pst感染的相对高敏感性相关。一方面,无反应生态型RLD和Ws与另一方面的有反应生态型哥伦比亚(Col)和直立型兰茨贝格(Ler)之间杂交产生的F1后代完全能够表达ISR,并表现出相对较高水平的基础抗性,类似于其对WCS417r有反应的亲本。这表明表达ISR的潜力和对Pst的相对高水平基础抗性均作为显性性状遗传。对Col×RLD杂交的F2和F3后代的分析表明,ISR的诱导性和对Pst的相对高基础抗性以3:1的方式共分离,表明这两种抗性机制均由单基因决定且存在遗传连锁。在RLD和Ws之间杂交的F1后代中,对WCS417r的反应性和对Pst的相对高水平基础抗性均未得到互补,这表明RLD和Ws在同一基因座上均受到影响,该基因座是表达ISR和对Pst的基础抗性所必需的。相应的基因座命名为ISR1,位于第3号染色体上的标记B4和GL1之间。观察到的ISR与对Pst的基础抗性之间的关联表明,拟南芥中根际细菌介导的针对Pst的ISR需要存在一个在针对Pst感染的基础抗性反应中起作用的单一显性基因。